Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
It's not about defining consciousness, it's about using consciousness, via Wittg…
ytc_UgxKUaP64…
G
@Raziel312 You don't have to print money, you just take the excess money from ov…
ytr_UgwuIg8n9…
G
Couldn't agree more. But I will add, that even before we get to the quantum com…
ytr_UgxZo1O1h…
G
@nobody85543 Artists have every right to feel outraged or fearful because it’s b…
ytr_UgyYEe5Bw…
G
I asked Grok 3 to make me an image I wanted...Grok 3 told me no...then gave an e…
ytc_UgxtDbdG9…
G
For people who don’t know
Microsoft is providing azure and AI that are used to …
ytc_UgwHn0lyh…
G
A lot of people who a aggressively pro-ai were previously NFTs- and crypto-bros.…
ytr_UgyyJwUT-…
G
I'm playing devil's advocate here because I do very much hate AI, but have seen …
ytr_Ugxd6sGuA…
Comment
looks like someone didn't watch the video
she addresses what happens when you can't tell
ai art removes the sense of wonder because you won't know which parts the prompter actually intended to be there. even if you know the prompt and the image is apparently as close to what the prompter intended, you'll never feel the same as when you look at human art, because the prompter has limited control. the human may guide the ai, but in the end the ai's logic, randomness, and training data is what creates the final result and that disconnect means you never know if that's the actual image the prompter had in mind (for example the prompter could've just given up and went "good enough it's close anyway"). meanwhile with human art every single stroke, every single color, every single choice is put with intent and you know that is exactly what the artist intended. even if the prompter says it's exactly what they had in mind down to the pixel which is virtually impossible, you will never know if they are telling the truth or misremembering. you'll never know what was in their mind. with human art, the artist is giving you a clear piece of their mind, their *soul.* you know that the artist intended for *every* detail to be there, from big to small. *this* is what soul in art means and why people call ai soulless
_"so if you can't tell it's fine?"_
for the majority of people when they see art, they go "oh that's a nice piece. why did the artist draw this way? i wonder how much time the artist took. i wonder how they learned to draw? the moon in the background may symbolize something, etc", but then they find out it's ai and they go "oh ok none of that means anything". so yeah, if you can't tell, it's fine. but once you find out it's like finding something disgusting in your soup. all hunger evaporates and you don't want to eat it anymore
_"ai mistakes are just as human and interesting as human mistakes"_
when a human makes a mistake, there could be a million reasons why. maybe the artist was feeling down that day? maybe they don't have good line control? bad at anatomy? arthritic? when an ai makes a mistake the only reason is that there isn't enough data. even if you can find more reasons they won't be emotionally charged and most likely just be cold errors
_"y'all need to actually think instead of basing your art appreciation purely on feelings"_
what makes art special is that it's all about feeling. without it it's just a nice image to look at (remember and keep in mind first wall of text about soul)
your kid makes a drawing of you and them. it's one of the worst things you've ever seen, but it's special because your kid made it and put love and effort into it. you hang it up on the fridge and years later you'll look back and see how much they've grown and you'll wish you can go back to when they were innocent and full of life, you'll cherish that drawing even if it's shitty by your standards. if it was ai it's just that, a shitty drawing. you just laugh then generate another better one
youtube
2025-06-18T00:1…
♥ 2
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | ai_itself |
| Reasoning | deontological |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | mixed |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytr_UgyhcIl1m2bk_lMZ16V4AaABAg.AJtHMQUVg1gAK0KaEwr3Yt","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgyhcIl1m2bk_lMZ16V4AaABAg.AJtHMQUVg1gAKMJYP0zpng","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwQgp_gIQc9wkjAhFZ4AaABAg.AJbAvrdQaeyAKAtTO3SKYs","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytr_UgyVSDnZSRkCSpgYhsd4AaABAg.AJ_AqV9fQAZAJexEpUhm_1","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytr_UgyC4KuchQ755g3l23h4AaABAg.AJOChWUM9BcAKAuCJg0Kj8","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzhgNA53beFsEOHs1t4AaABAg.AJLdgd9TrY9AJU0pjEAHTD","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzhgNA53beFsEOHs1t4AaABAg.AJLdgd9TrY9AJUu6hOOBXX","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxMfa7Ke3uT8yuGkAF4AaABAg.AJ4zWku76JZAJJLN1RTiAL","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxMfa7Ke3uT8yuGkAF4AaABAg.AJ4zWku76JZAJUXQ-HJufq","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"disapproval"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzMSsALskTMNFwrtKl4AaABAg.AIh78uoxbWLAIhf4VeUPLs","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"disapproval"}
]