Raw LLM — Corpus Dashboard

Look up by comment ID

Random samples — click to inspect

G Like everything, AI should be used as a tool not as a replacement. Use AI to hel… ytc_UgxZ45IpR… G I won't ever fear A.I, i will fear the ones that controls the A.I tools, just li… ytc_UgyEerlyR… G Most artists aren't/won't make money from their art anyway tbh. The ones that ar… ytr_UgyeRXdD_… G I think this whole "A.I. is a threat" argument is such a classic example of how … ytc_UgxgUX5vw… G The AI act is so poorly defined. You can loose 7% off corporate profit. Based on… ytc_Ugy0_hqSe… G AI is going to come for white collar jobs, automation is going to come for blue … ytc_UgwdpizzB… G I can see how her tone might come across that way! Sophia's character is designe… ytr_Ugz50PGdw… G AI can't understand the meaning of a question just as much as we can't. If an AI… ytc_UgyL09Zgz…

Comment

@dereckjames2725 Most importantly, the shoddy argument is: "SciShow quoted a statement that shows many scientists consider AI extinction risk to be a societal priority, and didn't quote some other statement (on Red Lines)." He reads a *lot* into this, implying ControlAI disagrees and saying you need to "pick a side" between the two -- when again, one of the sides is a random other statement that the video simply didn't say anything about. He also omits the fact that **the founder of ControlAI also signed the Red Lines statement**. The comparison is especially egregious considering the statement he's quoting was out for barely a month before the release of the SciShow video, so it probably wasn't public at the time the script was being written. And some incorrect facts (less important): he initially said that no AI had earned gold on the IMO, a claim he's since fixed. He also said Hank was wrong about "nobel prize winners" (plural) signing the extinction statement, but indeed two did (Geoffrey Hinton and Demis Hassabis). But I don't think he found *any* facts that SciShow got wrong, while getting multiple wrong himself. It was a rhetorically effective but extremely shoddy video.

youtube 2025-11-28T02:3… ♥ 2

Coding Result

Dimension	Value
Responsibility	none
Reasoning	deontological
Policy	none
Emotion	outrage
Coded at	2026-04-27T06:24:53.388235

Raw LLM Response

[
{"id":"ytr_UgzUuIJ6EbRP3LZ5OyV4AaABAg.A-cAHSJ3bSTA3wMOt8OC4c","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxMip-znYB5PR0C8tB4AaABAg.9zf5d0iXGr7A3wLSOa3Ekt","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugz3uAY5bKrr9M91PB14AaABAg.AOx7tpL0o1jAOx9UAB9IdM","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugz3uAY5bKrr9M91PB14AaABAg.AOx7tpL0o1jAOxASiF1km9","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwTX3T7YLLZBvQirSt4AaABAg.AQRoBsJyR1sAQRogZlQ_Wh","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwTX3T7YLLZBvQirSt4AaABAg.AQRoBsJyR1sAQRpL1t_Zsp","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwTX3T7YLLZBvQirSt4AaABAg.AQRoBsJyR1sAQRq6fsCtfu","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzfWTIyxZVxT9PkyjF4AaABAg.AQ-cxAnlJSvAQ2rIWn_BWe","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxzghU6kDYBi48vupZ4AaABAg.AQ-VI_FM3UqAQ1AdGtlSLF","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzaE7MuLfH0jW1P_A14AaABAg.AQ-O8GvqQTXAQaX99l_9bF","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"disapproval"}
]

Raw LLM Responses