Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Face Reality...she is using Adobe art software with Apple computer...which in co…
ytc_UgzX9jiOi…
G
Your question suggests a fundamental misunderstanding of how both AI and the wor…
ytr_UgyuqlxYW…
G
Here is something. You have a function f(x,y) and data pairs of x,f ignoring y b…
ytc_Ugx07qJMU…
G
As a debt collector, we’ve been informed that our competitors are utilizing AI a…
ytr_UgzqioxF4…
G
Because the wealthy believe that they'll be isolated from any of the blow back A…
rdc_n0gsvv3
G
@RaulDisconziXD mmm, actually no. There are a number of usage for AI generation …
ytr_Ugwpn5vnl…
G
Hey big dog, that's how these bubbles work. It's not that there's nothing valuab…
rdc_nc1cbbw
G
You are right in that people should stop listening to negative comments from art…
ytr_UgxJ2Qk-p…
Comment
Google should up to people doing seaches, whatever that user is searching for. What they're doing with machine learning is trying to take a guess at what a user means when they something as unspecific as such as "shoe". Right now, their algorithm runs the risk of being too narrow, due to the biases. Google want to overcome this.
No. It is not at all sexist to provide people with different results based on their gender. It's a little naive, a little basic. Ideally, we would want to serve users different results based on differences in what they are actually looking for. Gender can be an indicator of this, but Google pretty clearly want to move on the more precise and robust indicators. Gender is good, but still very rough.
youtube
AI Bias
2017-08-26T10:3…
♥ 3
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | approval |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytr_UgxFSBR1fccZhUpAPLh4AaABAg.8X9YdotL2FD8X9brX1a_pZ","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugy-xgV3WeXI8GRR5vZ4AaABAg.8X21IpT6-T_8X9_FHKU0Wq","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxUF0NgMk2XbjcOTLN4AaABAg.8Wlq_p0UDWX8WmNsKZjJwD","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzS0d_hiYY-las7zxB4AaABAg.8WibpzKM9lB8WihZ9c43b-","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzS0d_hiYY-las7zxB4AaABAg.8WibpzKM9lB8WiklrXRHzH","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugxf3nZXVD3q_XEXGnh4AaABAg.8WiH55mNZN28WiiEw8UlFZ","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgyEXtana9HUXy5iB0R4AaABAg.8WhLaHiOkMs8Wkuy5ihcl1","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzmIGscl53btE5R0OV4AaABAg.8Wguh4FSIdR8Wh1e0OcJbC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugwh23tsbFv5YB11ioB4AaABAg.8WguBmEHjPL8WgxkxpVR-v","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwpEMUhCSHwQdFCei94AaABAg.AGE5EZ_NLwAAKcj6IBrKmO","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"}
]