Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
I highly disagree with your positioning Sam.
You are not necessarily whining ove…
ytc_UgyDFnKiH…
G
The truth is that the AI that will replace me in my job should pay me because …
ytc_UgyT0uW6M…
G
I don't see your point, I don't see how doing this is criminal in anyway because…
ytr_Ugzxj_8fi…
G
Fu cosmicskeptic and chatgpt you inserted that ad out of nowhere you made me lis…
ytc_UgwI2mZtY…
G
it is ironic this program keeps getting interrupted by a.i. commercials, telling…
ytc_UgzuIzVeO…
G
@pizzsz
"Consolidation Thread"
I think you may not have actually understood …
ytr_Ugx7YtRdP…
G
Wtf? And they say korea is the safest place for women, oh please this is so path…
ytc_Ugy1z99vQ…
G
AI is going to be the biggest mirror for us, and eventually outsmart us. After a…
ytc_UgzFBYVEz…
Comment
@radscorpion8 It's not unreasonable to imagine that a super-intelligent system can be designed to check with its handlers from time to time.
Let's ignore for the moment the challenge of choosing trustworthy AI handlers to set such system's directives. Let's imagine that control is in the hands of the most competent and ethical people.
Let's imagine that during one of these tests the humans "in control" decide that they wish to modify the AI system for whatever reason.
Knowing its handlers to be less smarter than itself, the AI system has an open field of possibilities: it might comply, it might feign compliance, or it might wrangle the control back.
Since we are already seeing scheming behavior arise in less advanced systems, the general confidence that AI labs will be able root this behavior out while racing to build superintelligence is very low.
Again, it's not impossible to build a superintelligence that strives to keep itself aligned with human goals. It's just harder than just continuing scaling these systems at whatever cost.
youtube
AI Governance
2025-10-16T18:0…
♥ 3
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | developer |
| Reasoning | contractualist |
| Policy | regulate |
| Emotion | approval |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:26:44.938723 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytr_UgyfgxGpRqKXk1E697R4AaABAg.AOJUt4-1dEEAOJw6Ow-57O","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytr_UgyfgxGpRqKXk1E697R4AaABAg.AOJUt4-1dEEAOroJ4CwzpY","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"ban","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxV6pE8mgjX3NxCgAN4AaABAg.AOJU1KfHsDFAOJVBpDg55d","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxV6pE8mgjX3NxCgAN4AaABAg.AOJU1KfHsDFAOJg0pXwrqk","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzOAM377rC3BN7EAil4AaABAg.AOJSBkB1fBuAOJT8rLlC-A","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzOAM377rC3BN7EAil4AaABAg.AOJSBkB1fBuAOK35n-HOAy","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzP9Sr_durSIWHzG8Z4AaABAg.AOJH_DQ-EGKAOKY-w_769Q","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzP9Sr_durSIWHzG8Z4AaABAg.AOJH_DQ-EGKAOLn7VR94Yu","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwD6mxL7-9JP2eZp914AaABAg.AOJ6GCEnRAKAOOUZdBK_WY","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgyY5iyOMTQCJJ3XLsp4AaABAg.AOJ0qCM6cT6AOLA_D6i4Mk","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"fear"}
]