Raw LLM Responses

@misharatkevich9808 „, so this is a moot point that has already been decided the other way, and for damn good reasons. (Hint: image generation isn't the only thing these datasets are used for. Think image recognition, automatic captioning, etc...)” From what I found, this was not about making content or works of art. „A human brain is nothing more (and nothing less) than a giant biological machine evolved to interpret the dataset gathered by our senses.” It is also much more complex then anything we build, and based on fundamentally different concepts from what these programs have been based on. „The fact that now code can do something similar, but faster (yet less flexible) doesn't change anything. The ONLY thing that has changed is scale.” No. It mimics the results, but the fundamental ways it does this are completely different. „"You can do X but you cannot have a program doing X for you" is an idiotic rule that has no good reason to exist. It's hypocritical to insist otherwise.” Explain. Because what you said is nonsensical. There is a reason why programs are not give rights to copyright what they create or human rights. „If these models did anything beyond "look at images and extract concepts” ...........These models dont do this. They dont look in any way a living thing does, and they have no ability to hold concepts. They have no inner models of anything. They are just mindless pattern matching programs, that are incapable of understanding concepts, and only generate something to fit the patterns in the data set. „Once again, there is simply no step in the entire development pipeline where anyone involved has done anything wrong.” Again, the immoral data gathering methods are wrong. And no, I dont even care if they are legal(even if I doubt it). Being legal does not make something right, and something being illegal does not make it wrong. Legality is just a good shorthand and socio-economical tool. And so is the entire concepts behind this dehumanization of human art.