Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
That's an interesting perspective! Sophia does emphasize that while she strives …
ytr_Ugxx_JdBz…
G
Anybody, directly or indirectly working for with or to the advancement of A.I. i…
ytc_Ugz_VV57T…
G
I mean I like ai, but not for art or videos. Purely for research or mod pack opt…
ytc_UgzUiyHIn…
G
At this point, this isn't poisoning AI, it's giving AI literal dementia. Based a…
ytc_UgyN2h1ob…
G
Automation will improve and the more ppl switch to using automated cars, the mor…
ytc_Ugxeex7gx…
G
A pure delight seeing someone with this kind of platform advancing this viewpoin…
ytc_Ugx_ZA66R…
G
>I don't expect it's without Silicon Valley's overlords approving.
I don't t…
rdc_ohzff3a
G
Easy to say. If you're a business owner and your competitors are offering produc…
ytr_Ugxvf2mn_…
Comment
I’ll throw in my own two cents as a ML student researcher, but I’d argue you offer an alternative instead of saying it’s not bad but no solution.
My take is that it does steal artists work. But rather than their entire piece, it’s their labor. In many cases, it takes artists years to develop skills, such as the correct brush stroke. While yes, artists get inspiration, the difference is when the work is your own. AI art uses other people’s skills (brush strokes, color choices, artistic styles) and replicates something else using those parameters in their model.
I think it would be better for everyone if there was a better way of acquiring training data, famous art pieces not owned by one individual but seen as societally shared (like a piece in a museum seen by all) or pieces which artists explicitly allow for AI to be trained on. This would make it much less controversial and could offer an opportunity for artists to use AI in their own works.
youtube
Viral AI Reaction
2022-12-22T18:3…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | ai_itself |
| Reasoning | deontological |
| Policy | liability |
| Emotion | outrage |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:26:44.938723 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytr_Ugwj5-JFnQBMy7_-gr54AaABAg.9jwoJAPi32n9jwoXUbC32U","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzKEfI1v5uL8n6qnkB4AaABAg.9jwaip6GRoP9jxF_A903g1","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzKEfI1v5uL8n6qnkB4AaABAg.9jwaip6GRoP9jzN3_8AOw3","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"unclear","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwjTZXPWc04e4VNVix4AaABAg.9jwP9aJdrRU9jxOhZExDCZ","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytr_UgyRKFeec-szjWhVb6B4AaABAg.9jwO9Tz3zYf9k1f-cXf1GB","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugxn9gTRDk5GhXwwWWR4AaABAg.9jwGOK8TTze9jwIdwih3iO","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"unclear","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugw9Lvi5iKF16GhgOgl4AaABAg.9jvsisMyjwi9jvx_0_uzSB","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugw9Lvi5iKF16GhgOgl4AaABAg.9jvsisMyjwi9k3UKhAVdzf","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwvE-EK9aFXKtTLTiB4AaABAg.9jvhKVHLEAh9jwmGtpLtwk","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwvE-EK9aFXKtTLTiB4AaABAg.9jvhKVHLEAh9jwnwHO4E1G","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"}
]