Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
I only use AI for shitty images for my personas on AI websites and my profile pi…
ytc_Ugz9JIlDK…
G
Humans have evolved from monkeys. Today, humans make monkeys dance; in the same …
ytc_UgxlbkYZf…
G
No need for a robot in the car. If a bullet goes through the door and inside, it…
ytc_UgxjoTvyD…
G
It's always the same thing with the hype... GPT 03 was really bad at UI work and…
ytc_UgxIXcW1v…
G
Do they just use gyros to keep the robot in balance ..? Balance Problem solved…
ytc_UgwQq6p6d…
G
As a beginner artist, this made me so happy cause I was so used to being told my…
ytc_Ugy4fbi6N…
G
We will still create beauty, “emotional poetry” art! We are the creators ! Never…
ytc_UgwkdQpiJ…
G
GPT4 - Copilot and similar clearly provide excellent productivity boosts, especi…
ytc_UgxyLMpyA…
Comment
Gladwell's remote work hypocrisy perfectly encapsulates elite discourse on AI governance—rules apply to subordinates, never to rule-makers. The "return to office" crusade masked capital's need to reassert workplace surveillance and control after workers glimpsed autonomy during lockdown. Notice the pattern: executives demanding office presence while maintaining remote flexibility, pundits advocating austerity from financial comfort, tech leaders warning about AI risks while racing to deploy it. This class position shapes who gets to frame "responsible AI"—comfortable elites theorizing ethics while precarious workers face algorithmic management without recourse. The watsonx.governance pitch IBM sells presumes corporate goodwill determining what counts as "responsible." But governance designed by those who profit from AI systematically defines problems to preserve their interests. Real accountability would center affected workers and communities, not executives optimizing brand reputation. Gladwell championing office mandates while remote himself isn't just hypocrisy; it's the governance model IBM represents—power imposing frameworks on others it exempts itself from.
youtube
AI Responsibility
2025-11-17T09:5…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | contractualist |
| Policy | regulate |
| Emotion | outrage |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:26:44.938723 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytr_Ugx9OLAA3Z4FOwfk20l4AaABAg.AS_vOhIRKvSASaINwoceoZ","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugy1BotzE-zR5CfQlnV4AaABAg.AC2LEyLGc8iAC2PXx2mX5X","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgjjhVmopdBPnngCoAEC.8BsAm4xHtuS8BtL1-4lmhu","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UghK9JWzzYfksHgCoAEC.8BrrReLGHpH8Bs2iLAUyj7","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UggrhJ60UdmN_3gCoAEC.8BrrEAPregI8BtAGWVJG1k","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgigfbsD3xVn6XgCoAEC.8BrcF8D9mNF8BsC33aqVbL","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgibUnXWq06xDXgCoAEC.8BrbvRz8MRl8Bru_8BqsTy","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"unclear","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugwh3v-8GeoSdSmne4B4AaABAg.A3T1yHwit-FAPcJByxRXmy","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzF-wZJ569On403PCR4AaABAg.A3QWkoAMNS1APcJO2RR4NT","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugz1b6hJ0hdS_gdTq4F4AaABAg.AHFbF0naRvIAIoHqlCUyiT","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"}
]