Raw LLM Responses

She is very genuine. She is very intelligent. But she seems to be just wrong in her beliefs on many levels. She has the typical modernist worldview where the ultimate good is to achieve equity and universal democracy where all people are equal, have an equal voice, have equal power. This betrays society-based viewpoint, her beliefs on reality come from what society tells her to say rather than real understanding of the world. The sad reality of mankind is this is untrue. The most fragile form of government is democracy, which is inherently impossible. A republic like the US is not a true democracy and the less of a democracy it is actually the longer it will last, for better or worse. She says that empires are inherently unstable and will evolve into democracies, in reality what we see is even brutal empires can survive for hundreds of years while democracies often self-destruct. The French Revolution for instance lasted 10 brutal years before Napoleon took over, and people were happy the experiment was over. She thinks AI won't be used as superpower-deciding weaponry but mass-produced ai-driven drone warfare already changed the face of the battlefield and makes half of the US' military might obsolete. If all the AI mythos is false claims for fundraising, are all the investors just fools? Theranos hoodwinked some people out of 700M. What's the total investment in AI and AI infrastructure? It was already over $1.6 Trillion in 2024. Every single country, every government, every company. They're ALL going for broke on it. Do we really think they've all just been hoodwinked by the mythos?