Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
@SuperMimi-nb Theft is when the original owner doesn't have their thing anymore.…
ytr_Ugw_YI8QB…
G
so many of the issues that AI claims to solve can be solved with basic human col…
ytc_UgzToeYVv…
G
Giving somebody access to a manufacturing robot and teaching them how to use/pro…
ytc_Ugw3deGFf…
G
Yes, robots should have rights. No they should not have the same rights as huma…
ytc_UgwKaH_8G…
G
it’s time for this to go waymo are not much better drivers than Youmans. I could…
ytc_UgwbI-kqp…
G
This reminds me of that one time I asked my mom to help me with my homework and …
ytc_UgzcA8fPK…
G
Calling yourself an AI artist is like calling yourself a Gordan Ramsey chef by m…
ytc_UgwlkeD8y…
G
Did a robot wearing the skin of a muscle bound Austrian man show up at his door?…
ytc_UgwMZCeaC…
Comment
No, not because of reasons. If you provide an LLM with sufficient context, you can get the exact opposite answer by conditioning the model with one-sided argumentative input and asking it to summarise the argumentative balance. In other words, if you constrain the LLM to your arguments, you can move the needle in the direction you want. That's what Knowles did here. ChatGPT was being given arguments in favour of God's existence. Had Knowles provided nothing but arguments against God's existence, the percentage would have fallen.
youtube
2026-01-01T17:5…
♥ 1
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | user |
| Reasoning | mixed |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | mixed |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytr_UgzEA3acZ-l9c1rl7nJ4AaABAg.9pmSYRZ_aox9q-B9qxX-oQ","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxqPt6Ei4yeeYfjnqt4AaABAg.9pmSSeEVBSP9pmUClAwSE_","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxqPt6Ei4yeeYfjnqt4AaABAg.9pmSSeEVBSP9pmV1gpYZlP","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgyJ-g4s0YCK3ww-udB4AaABAg.ARcYd3-3BcHARhhqklV7Gc","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwvFM9vI6CDiSqRt214AaABAg.ARVPc8reC8aARVQ19ORiZF","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugx3-6f3SPllSDPEw7h4AaABAg.ARQ6IAa2mZHARS4M5_etBS","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgyqLx-ZGqZRaByzpcZ4AaABAg.ARPbenVSo9UARSS35qATVR","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxRSwpMwJBU8t6gmSp4AaABAg.ARPRq44tQOuARPWU2xsmAY","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgyqO5BgJLuUqdy_NhB4AaABAg.ARPOTl2SBFFARS2xh2ku_Q","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugx1Xt-9E2fJbIKjacx4AaABAg.ARPORyBS6mhARQLqyQLIjY","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"}
]