Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
ok so if he's clearly saying it's possible for them to be indistinguishable from…
ytc_UgjNkDdlY…
G
@bettyarts5267 it doesn't "use references", a machine isn't the same as a huma…
ytr_UgyaLYKSm…
G
> 1.5 million doesn't even pay for one AI dev at Meta
Just as well most AI c…
rdc_n7zwdnu
G
I gaurantee you there will never ever and impossible for a movie AI as Hal/ Matr…
ytc_UgyhYnjms…
G
What is truly interesting is how many people think they won't be affected by AI.…
ytc_Ugyy5IyVa…
G
I remember warning some former colleagues a decade ago, which turned into lively…
ytc_UgzFG234U…
G
Most of the comments are exactly what AI would say to try to convince you it was…
ytc_UgyQjQ2yS…
G
7:15
I just searched google for this sentence and included the actors name to fi…
ytc_Ugwes-2GK…
Comment
No, not because of reasons. If you provide an LLM with sufficient context, you can get the exact opposite answer by conditioning the model with one-sided argumentative input and asking it to summarise the argumentative balance. In other words, if you constrain the LLM to your arguments, you can move the needle in the direction you want. That's what Knowles did here. ChatGPT was being given arguments in favour of God's existence. Had Knowles provided nothing but arguments against God's existence, the percentage would have fallen.
youtube
2026-01-01T17:5…
♥ 1
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | user |
| Reasoning | mixed |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | mixed |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytr_UgzEA3acZ-l9c1rl7nJ4AaABAg.9pmSYRZ_aox9q-B9qxX-oQ","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxqPt6Ei4yeeYfjnqt4AaABAg.9pmSSeEVBSP9pmUClAwSE_","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxqPt6Ei4yeeYfjnqt4AaABAg.9pmSSeEVBSP9pmV1gpYZlP","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgyJ-g4s0YCK3ww-udB4AaABAg.ARcYd3-3BcHARhhqklV7Gc","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwvFM9vI6CDiSqRt214AaABAg.ARVPc8reC8aARVQ19ORiZF","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugx3-6f3SPllSDPEw7h4AaABAg.ARQ6IAa2mZHARS4M5_etBS","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgyqLx-ZGqZRaByzpcZ4AaABAg.ARPbenVSo9UARSS35qATVR","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxRSwpMwJBU8t6gmSp4AaABAg.ARPRq44tQOuARPWU2xsmAY","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgyqO5BgJLuUqdy_NhB4AaABAg.ARPOTl2SBFFARS2xh2ku_Q","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugx1Xt-9E2fJbIKjacx4AaABAg.ARPORyBS6mhARQLqyQLIjY","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"}
]