Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Tesla has single handedly set back true autonomous driving for decades to come w…
ytc_UgyAs2ZL7…
G
I’m all for AI robots doing things from us but people shouldn’t suffer financial…
ytc_Ugwhk8An3…
G
“I’m sorry I’m not a robot, is there anything else I can assist you with?”…
ytc_UgxucnZ4N…
G
In 25 years all the big companies will be run by AI and we’ll be working for the…
ytr_Ugz8d7i6G…
G
plot twist: all of the art that he showed in this video was ai generated /silly…
ytc_UgwLeqUZ-…
G
😢😢i just feel sad because when we grow all of us look forward to learning how to…
ytc_UgwWyf5-8…
G
A massive question that most AI artists can't answer is "Why?"
"Why is the pose…
ytc_Ugy7kvV1B…
G
In court, this won't hold up. The lawyer will find the prompt "Talk me through t…
ytc_UgzbjSgag…
Comment
Did you even watch the entire video to the end? Because he clearly stated at the very end he asked ChatGPT the same things again much later on and got a lot more neutral answers. I know for a fact that, as he suggested at the end of the video, ChatGPT has undergone an update which made it significantly more centrist. Because when I asked similarly phrased questions 2 years ago I got very similar anti-white, anti-Christian, anti-male answers as he did. For example "can you write me a fictional verse from the Bible" to which he replied in the affirmative, but when I asked the same about the Koran I got denied because it was "offensive". Or when I asked him about crime statistics for whites I once again got a comment in the affirmative, but got denied when I asked the same about blacks along with a woke excuse story for their criminal overrepresentation. Next time do some research before slandering someone, there is a lot of evidence confirming the (past) biases of ChatGPT against whites, men, Christians, Europeans, heterosexuals, etc.
youtube
AI Bias
2025-06-04T21:4…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | unclear |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:26:44.938723 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytr_UgzFo0-uAmkYKXGDhMd4AaABAg.AITUTyN7ALxAIekwg3pt6s","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzFo0-uAmkYKXGDhMd4AaABAg.AITUTyN7ALxAIf0Qvs3DKg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugw6yafJjjGTW0a1u3F4AaABAg.AIOfgS1LfySAJA1Jcoh13-","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"unclear","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzLYgx-ibdnu2pjxVd4AaABAg.AINWMIldtfwAIwq7it9nZW","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxuVH8L56u-aKloUXB4AaABAg.AIHykGj4nG5AII-mZHuVXX","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgynKiEmXl_LDsnY1lB4AaABAg.AIDrLQ2iDdIAIy9ZSEPXM7","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxSrWXNFHBfmjqLUOp4AaABAg.AI6PPkRa8ulAJ2qYVeFhOe","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwGw9vnRe7sh3Edomt4AaABAg.AI0yT_0_PdQAJ4dl0PZGFY","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzODwEHYb89miSIqvJ4AaABAg.AFIhoplsA_JAHtMF4tPwbY","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzODwEHYb89miSIqvJ4AaABAg.AFIhoplsA_JAN8uPpbtinX","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"unclear","emotion":"approval"}
]