Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
As an active AI user, more than a few hundred lines and even the best models bre…
ytc_UgwBQ4CCT…
G
If they replace us with AI there will be no more consumers to purchase products …
ytc_UgxvIUvJD…
G
If AI's primary objective is human well-being, then maybe it will shutdown nucle…
ytc_Ugx84QSTj…
G
as a fellow rambler who can’t shut up, this guy needs to just shut up and let t…
ytc_Ugx4dcPvA…
G
Ehhhh indigenous people are going to be fine in comparison to the rest of humani…
ytc_UgzeQE6fo…
G
you can believe digital stuff is the footage is long enough
because the longer t…
ytr_UgyzNCfwp…
G
I suspect they are all automated, copying, rewording and uploading content from …
ytr_UgxGQNvHG…
G
I went to a liberal arts school and work remotely so genuinely never interacted …
rdc_n60k76z
Comment
Did you even watch the entire video to the end? Because he clearly stated at the very end he asked ChatGPT the same things again much later on and got a lot more neutral answers. I know for a fact that, as he suggested at the end of the video, ChatGPT has undergone an update which made it significantly more centrist. Because when I asked similarly phrased questions 2 years ago I got very similar anti-white, anti-Christian, anti-male answers as he did. For example "can you write me a fictional verse from the Bible" to which he replied in the affirmative, but when I asked the same about the Koran I got denied because it was "offensive". Or when I asked him about crime statistics for whites I once again got a comment in the affirmative, but got denied when I asked the same about blacks along with a woke excuse story for their criminal overrepresentation. Next time do some research before slandering someone, there is a lot of evidence confirming the (past) biases of ChatGPT against whites, men, Christians, Europeans, heterosexuals, etc.
youtube
AI Bias
2025-06-04T21:4…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | unclear |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:26:44.938723 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytr_UgzFo0-uAmkYKXGDhMd4AaABAg.AITUTyN7ALxAIekwg3pt6s","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzFo0-uAmkYKXGDhMd4AaABAg.AITUTyN7ALxAIf0Qvs3DKg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugw6yafJjjGTW0a1u3F4AaABAg.AIOfgS1LfySAJA1Jcoh13-","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"unclear","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzLYgx-ibdnu2pjxVd4AaABAg.AINWMIldtfwAIwq7it9nZW","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxuVH8L56u-aKloUXB4AaABAg.AIHykGj4nG5AII-mZHuVXX","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgynKiEmXl_LDsnY1lB4AaABAg.AIDrLQ2iDdIAIy9ZSEPXM7","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxSrWXNFHBfmjqLUOp4AaABAg.AI6PPkRa8ulAJ2qYVeFhOe","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwGw9vnRe7sh3Edomt4AaABAg.AI0yT_0_PdQAJ4dl0PZGFY","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzODwEHYb89miSIqvJ4AaABAg.AFIhoplsA_JAHtMF4tPwbY","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzODwEHYb89miSIqvJ4AaABAg.AFIhoplsA_JAN8uPpbtinX","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"unclear","emotion":"approval"}
]