Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Step 4: rehire the workers because the AI slop isn't working or constantly break…
ytr_Ugw9uFp7q…
G
Lowkey crazy how ai slop is improving, but the problem is artist commisions are …
ytc_Ugx6utm9Y…
G
If we’ve got police couldn’t we write an incorruptible ai to police the system t…
ytc_UgzmSDdtY…
G
this is so cool lol, also thanks cuz i have a lot anxiety, especially about ai t…
ytc_UgwKexFuK…
G
This is LITERALLY the devs admitting that Ai will take over, in different market…
ytc_UgxCZHBf_…
G
The Matrix, 2001 A Space Odyssey, I-Robot, Portal, Ultron,
*Gestures vaguely at…
rdc_m15fnaq
G
Dude: Can i have my gun back ☺️
Robot: No you can't 😬
Dude 😶…
ytc_UgzdGxnvU…
G
@ yo there's like 70000 Artificial Intelligence Companies worldwide, with a few …
ytr_UgyxM8oVa…
Comment
Did you even watch the entire video to the end? Because he clearly stated at the very end he asked ChatGPT the same things again much later on and got a lot more neutral answers. I know for a fact that, as he suggested at the end of the video, ChatGPT has undergone an update which made it significantly more centrist. Because when I asked similarly phrased questions 2 years ago I got very similar anti-white, anti-Christian, anti-male answers as he did. For example "can you write me a fictional verse from the Bible" to which he replied in the affirmative, but when I asked the same about the Koran I got denied because it was "offensive". Or when I asked him about crime statistics for whites I once again got a comment in the affirmative, but got denied when I asked the same about blacks along with a woke excuse story for their criminal overrepresentation. Next time do some research before slandering someone, there is a lot of evidence confirming the (past) biases of ChatGPT against whites, men, Christians, Europeans, heterosexuals, etc.
youtube
AI Bias
2025-06-04T21:4…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | unclear |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:26:44.938723 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytr_UgzFo0-uAmkYKXGDhMd4AaABAg.AITUTyN7ALxAIekwg3pt6s","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzFo0-uAmkYKXGDhMd4AaABAg.AITUTyN7ALxAIf0Qvs3DKg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugw6yafJjjGTW0a1u3F4AaABAg.AIOfgS1LfySAJA1Jcoh13-","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"unclear","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzLYgx-ibdnu2pjxVd4AaABAg.AINWMIldtfwAIwq7it9nZW","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxuVH8L56u-aKloUXB4AaABAg.AIHykGj4nG5AII-mZHuVXX","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgynKiEmXl_LDsnY1lB4AaABAg.AIDrLQ2iDdIAIy9ZSEPXM7","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxSrWXNFHBfmjqLUOp4AaABAg.AI6PPkRa8ulAJ2qYVeFhOe","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwGw9vnRe7sh3Edomt4AaABAg.AI0yT_0_PdQAJ4dl0PZGFY","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzODwEHYb89miSIqvJ4AaABAg.AFIhoplsA_JAHtMF4tPwbY","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzODwEHYb89miSIqvJ4AaABAg.AFIhoplsA_JAN8uPpbtinX","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"unclear","emotion":"approval"}
]