Raw LLM — Corpus Dashboard

Look up by comment ID

Random samples — click to inspect

G They said the same about ai not being able to create art and look how that turne… ytr_UgzhHsELt… G Its regulated in a woke way, ask chatgpt what is a woman and you will see.… ytc_UgzUuRtXw… G My field was AI research before I got burned out. I finally started using AI rec… ytc_Ugw9wYNKc… G Bizarre that AI couldn't get the two rockets problem right. It's the sort of pro… ytc_UgxlurhnO… G @Cheese-itenergy-db4vuno they dont. my friend got caught up in it and he blocked… ytr_UgwnQNyCj… G People need time to adjust to trusting AI which could take 5-10 years but eventu… ytc_UgxYPfOwN… G I would argue that depending on how fast this goes, it might reduce income for c… ytc_UgyDf4gf-… G I feel silly in that I thought the bubble would have popped by now. I fully expe… ytc_UgysYf8AM…

Comment

The “slow and expensive” point doesn’t refute what she’s saying. “Art is accessible” doesn’t mean “professional results are cheap and instant,” it means nobody is stopping someone from learning and making things. If the rebuttal is “yeah but swirling shit doesn’t sell,” then you’re not arguing access, you’re arguing marketable polish, which is exactly what AI shortcuts. “AI exists, adapt” also isn’t an argument, it’s a shrug. We regulate inevitable things all the time: cars exist, so we made seatbelts; drugs exist, so we regulate distribution; the internet exists, so we made IP law. “Exists” has never meant “therefore ethical” or “therefore immune from rules.” And you kind of give the game away at the end: “AI has stolen everyone’s styles,” then your fix is “artists should invent new styles and protect them.” That’s not a fix unless you’re also talking about actual guardrails (opt-in datasets, licensing/compensation, labeling). Otherwise it’s just shifting the burden onto creators while the systems built on their work keep scaling.

youtube Viral AI Reaction 2025-12-26T02:5… ♥ 2

Coding Result

Dimension	Value
Responsibility	none
Reasoning	consequentialist
Policy	none
Emotion	indifference
Coded at	2026-04-27T06:24:53.388235

Raw LLM Response

[
{"id":"ytr_UgyqcvmeKUUsD9L9WIB4AaABAg.ASEztrEo5XaAT8RuG3HzJI","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxBOR5bkeOfahzh79B4AaABAg.ARw0FTEOPeSARxS7i6g_w7","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxBOR5bkeOfahzh79B4AaABAg.ARw0FTEOPeSARxdAAjoyMm","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugze4yitfNdVPjurpF14AaABAg.ARgZZKA_H6aARxUH51MG0z","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgyY33IqT7yFV7kxQ4R4AaABAg.ARN8kLj0wbkARwG_WYzoJD","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_UgyY33IqT7yFV7kxQ4R4AaABAg.ARN8kLj0wbkARwisgnglvI","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgyY33IqT7yFV7kxQ4R4AaABAg.ARN8kLj0wbkARwkwDtl5zS","responsibility":"society","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzeyO9SGWo6Nbs1AwN4AaABAg.ARMncEDXNhXARWrIGdXw7E","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugxo3QVNa0MxyVls3yl4AaABAg.ARLVfgOerx9ARkm0b9Qffd","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytr_UgyksGkApC6OZaC6poV4AaABAg.AR6p2ECW40RARB-0o16TtY","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}
]

Raw LLM Responses