Raw LLM — Corpus Dashboard

Look up by comment ID

Random samples — click to inspect

G This is where humans are better at than AI . It took 4 trys to come to the righ… ytc_UgzusoCId… G Space communism post-scarcity is the goal. AI will either kill capitalism or cr… ytc_UgyGq2wHp… G Id compare ai art to photobashing more than taking inspiration, you know? Becaus… ytr_UgwMhYNNB… G Bluesrains 0 seconds ago Elon Has Doubts About AI, But I Don't. Since AI Learn… ytc_Ugx7mozp1… G As I lay here in bed with my 2 little dogs, while the recently unleashed autonom… ytc_Ugzcu6W_F… G @mastpg So instead of just saying it you will pretend that it should be obvious… ytr_UgzQPKe63… G These massive data centers and AI operations shouldn’t be able to grow unchecked… ytc_UgwqT0_6f… G I honestly don't care if an AI steals my art style. I already stole it from Jami… ytc_UgwVnevqE…

Comment

The “slow and expensive” point doesn’t refute what she’s saying. “Art is accessible” doesn’t mean “professional results are cheap and instant,” it means nobody is stopping someone from learning and making things. If the rebuttal is “yeah but swirling shit doesn’t sell,” then you’re not arguing access, you’re arguing marketable polish, which is exactly what AI shortcuts. “AI exists, adapt” also isn’t an argument, it’s a shrug. We regulate inevitable things all the time: cars exist, so we made seatbelts; drugs exist, so we regulate distribution; the internet exists, so we made IP law. “Exists” has never meant “therefore ethical” or “therefore immune from rules.” And you kind of give the game away at the end: “AI has stolen everyone’s styles,” then your fix is “artists should invent new styles and protect them.” That’s not a fix unless you’re also talking about actual guardrails (opt-in datasets, licensing/compensation, labeling). Otherwise it’s just shifting the burden onto creators while the systems built on their work keep scaling.

youtube Viral AI Reaction 2025-12-26T02:5… ♥ 2

Coding Result

Dimension	Value
Responsibility	none
Reasoning	consequentialist
Policy	none
Emotion	indifference
Coded at	2026-04-27T06:24:53.388235

Raw LLM Response

[
{"id":"ytr_UgyqcvmeKUUsD9L9WIB4AaABAg.ASEztrEo5XaAT8RuG3HzJI","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxBOR5bkeOfahzh79B4AaABAg.ARw0FTEOPeSARxS7i6g_w7","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxBOR5bkeOfahzh79B4AaABAg.ARw0FTEOPeSARxdAAjoyMm","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugze4yitfNdVPjurpF14AaABAg.ARgZZKA_H6aARxUH51MG0z","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgyY33IqT7yFV7kxQ4R4AaABAg.ARN8kLj0wbkARwG_WYzoJD","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_UgyY33IqT7yFV7kxQ4R4AaABAg.ARN8kLj0wbkARwisgnglvI","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgyY33IqT7yFV7kxQ4R4AaABAg.ARN8kLj0wbkARwkwDtl5zS","responsibility":"society","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzeyO9SGWo6Nbs1AwN4AaABAg.ARMncEDXNhXARWrIGdXw7E","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugxo3QVNa0MxyVls3yl4AaABAg.ARLVfgOerx9ARkm0b9Qffd","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytr_UgyksGkApC6OZaC6poV4AaABAg.AR6p2ECW40RARB-0o16TtY","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}
]

Raw LLM Responses