Raw LLM Responses

I listen to AI. Then I give it more context. Why wouldn’t you listen to a system that you have total control over? Like you can just ask it to speak in the way of someone you think is wise and have them look into points that you think are valid and then give the systems counter arguments so you can make better predictions. Also just so you are aware. Bitcoin was not regulated at 30 million. AI has 130-150 million in the political system. I learned about this at 130 million via an AI chat and Bernie Sanders just made a video about the 150 million. My prediction that Bernie and the progressives will be successful is 10-5%. The rest is up to a conservative or abundance left wing candidate. Both will end up with low AI regulations. "Hi my name is Annie your AI virtual assistant, how can I help?" will be all required for a left wing abundance candidate. Nothing will probably be required for a conservative. Then it goes deeper. For AI the guaranteed 2 yr low regulation build runway under the orange tyrant gives access to leveraging European style regulations as a target for regulation ready AI at premium prices down the road in case a progressive actually wins due to an abundance left wing candidate creating slums or a right wing candidate causing high levels of apocalyptic drug overdose like during the 90's in the rust belt with the conservative NAFTA strategy executed under Bill Clinton. Kind of like insurance for the inevitable lowering of living conditions for the masses in case they actually vote sensibly due to the pain. That is the level of logic that AI can give people. That's why people listen to AI. Any logical counter argument will be taken into consideration of course. But my prediction for that happening is about 10-5% as those arguments were created via AI systems not emotions and quick clever thinking.