Raw LLM — Corpus Dashboard

Look up by comment ID

Random samples — click to inspect

G I am a senior tech lead at a startup. I have paid AI tools . paying from own poc… ytc_Ugy1f63Lp… G The building's been on fire for 2 days, but now let's think about putting the fi… ytc_UgzW1fCsC… G > continue to have kids But why though? Why risk the lives of people who don… rdc_emnxg9c G Automatation has more often resulted in people working longer hours with greater… ytc_Ugz7QTood… G The ai art itself is stealing, ai takes elements from other drawings it sees and… ytr_Ugz1EMVWS… G It's important to remember the value of humility and respect for our origins. Ju… ytr_UgwTSET_8… G Thats what keeps me up at night the most. Death is a natural course that i feel… ytr_UgwcE55bO… G If a car is self driving theres no reason to own it. The cost could be 150grand … rdc_dbz4wnx

Comment

Oh this is a really good take to have, because it fixes one fundamental flaw with the soullessness argument. Only calling AI art "soulless" leaves the opening of a potential future in which the machine may achieve that benchmark of seeming to have soul. But taking this angle, which honestly also just seems more accurate to me since it doesn't rely on something so abstract to be understandable, makes the AI ever reaching this standard a categorical impossibility. At least in the generalizable function of these models, which compile, mix and return sets of existing data without a unique perspective of its own (...wait, dangit, you could argue that the AI's definition of "accuracy" could be said to be that unique perspective), these programs won't ever really be able to mimic the effect of just a single artist's soul at the heart of the process to get the results. As I've realized right there, the goalposts are still subjective with this argument, but I'd say they are at least less so than when trying to attribute "a soul" to any given piece of art.

youtube Viral AI Reaction 2025-05-15T02:5… ♥ 4

Coding Result

Dimension	Value
Responsibility	unclear
Reasoning	mixed
Policy	unclear
Emotion	approval
Coded at	2026-04-27T06:24:53.388235

Raw LLM Response

[
{"id":"ytr_UgzZqPGSP5g1RWjJtv54AaABAg.AI7Jw28pyDxAI92KgNHg6r","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"disapproval"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugyd1MTuAshu-1q7KkR4AaABAg.AI7DK79eb7oAIHLh4xcjwu","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxJyna4GtKpOGVgOXF4AaABAg.AI78STVEztqAIGHJLRaQNt","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"disapproval"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzdrvhtALY51m5bE3t4AaABAg.AI75EfiL0zOAJ1wJlLaOqA","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugw8L7e_Np1TKkzUV_h4AaABAg.AI6xR6K8VUxAJ6FVOU7rtY","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwJAXwgQ3k9EB-upIN4AaABAg.AI6tm7ltOHIAI7RlExc6DJ","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzQw2PcN7XYIL6IpY94AaABAg.AI6tGV99RbnAI9CcRj3yPY","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzQw2PcN7XYIL6IpY94AaABAg.AI6tGV99RbnAIGPsLAJbYZ","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"disapproval"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzQw2PcN7XYIL6IpY94AaABAg.AI6tGV99RbnAIGd5GcTTg7","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"liability","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytr_UgyU8XsWqusLj9RTVmt4AaABAg.AI6jYyBXW7RAI7ch5Y-Pjq","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"approval"}
]

Raw LLM Responses