Raw LLM Responses

But these two are largely different. Effective "robotic arms" have been around for decades, but they have yet to fully replace low-wage manual labor for the simple reason that they are very expensive to manufacture and maintain, and so far only have application in areas where it is economically worth the effort and cost, such as car manufacturing where a single very expensive "robot" replaces dozens of workers and at the same time is dozens of times more efficient - faster, stronger, better quality and does not suffer from distraction, fatigue or fatal mistake and produces a product that costs tens of thousands of dollars. In comparison, generative AI is a fact, at the moment you can literally for free, in seconds, generate any text, drawing, write a script for you, translate for you from and to dozens of languages ​​with completely acceptable quality and what not, taking into account the fact, that what we have access to is in its primary form. Improved versions come online monthly and who knows what is currently in the labs that we have not even heard of because the companies have no financial incentive to release it to the public. Moreover, judging by the already real examples, be sure that in the near future the answer to the problem with "robotic arms" will also be answered through the already existing generative AI. So they've already discovered a completely new antibiotic concept that defies any reasonable "human" logic thanks to a strictly specific version of their commercial product, and what's left for a fundamentally simpler problem like the economical implementation of a robotic fast-breakfast system? It's just that the answer to this question is not on the agenda yet, and you can be completely sure that "these executives" have a very good idea.