Raw LLM Responses

@PLMMJ-.-It's an hour and a half long, forgive me for live commenting. Calling something plagiarism when you have not done anything to justify wise plagiarism is objectively bad writing, because you're a century on people already agreeing with you, we're in a major part of the video is actually convincing people to agree with you on this specific topic. The fact that he keeps calling AI art "theft", _before_ he actually made an argument of _why_ it is theft, In a video titled "AI Art is Theft", which any reasonable Viewer would assume he's _at least_ going to pretend, if not actually attempt to convince people who are not already convinced that the use of AI is in fact theft, is kind of an obvious problem. Most people who don't already agree with the video creator are probably going to drop the video before he actually gets to his argument, and for good reason. It makes them so annoyed at the video that by the time they actually get to the point where he makes a justification for his position, they're probably going to not approach it in the best of faith just due to the emotional state they're in, so what's the point? Not to mention What him unironically acting like he's correct, before he actually proves he's correct, in a video _explicitly_ about proving he's correct on this specific topic, tells me he's not exactly the type to actually be able to consider other people's point of view. I had to take an 11 day break from this video fix how exhausting it was (and the fact I frankly had better face dudes than to entertain this arrogant midwit's vapid arguments), so this creator should frankly be grateful I came back just to hear him out.