Raw LLM Responses

Everything you said is disgusting and insane. You are an artist hating, narcissistic, elitist prick. „Drawing and painting are low-level skills that can, should and will be left behind (90% of our time spent on it at the very least, there are always corner cases and the need to do 'touch the wheel' here and there) in order for humans to keep moving upwards in our creative endeavors” That is completely wrong. Drawing is one creative endeavor people talk when they mention that automation should allow us to concentrate on them. That is a fact. And that is not even taking into consideration that drawing in a good way takes massive skill. „it'll get 100x better (no joke, anyone with any visibility into what's coming knows this to a certainty) in the next year” 1. People say this constantly about about self driving cars. They have said this for 10 years, non-stop. They are still horrible, and getting harder and harder to improve as they get better. 2. Dude. The only reason why these programs are as good as they are is because of the massive amount of data they have been fed. That is it. It is not going to get significantly better without exponentially more parameters and data. „ maybe then people will stop fooling themselves into thinking they can compete with it at useless tasks like drawing or painting.” Useless tasks? Dude. Drawing and painting are the point itself, you deluded, artist hating elitist. „The model is a lot more original than a human artist and pulls from a lot more learning than a person does” That is the complete opposite of reality. These programs are only mindless algorithms that scan for patterns in the data set and then generate something to fit into the data set, with zero capability to understand the underlining rules(and thus zero capability to know when to break the rules), and zero capability to deviate, or to make choices. „If something is publicly available to be looked at, it can be looked at, used as reference/inspiration and learned from” And these programs are incapable of being inspired, do not learn anything like a human, and do not take references in the same way artists are supposed to do. They are only stochastic parrots. Nothing more. „won't even call them the artists because 99.9% of the artists I know, myself included, are in favor of this” That is the opposite of reality. Almost all artists hate this technology. Both Hayao Miyazaki and Guillermo del Toro called this technology „an insult to life itself”. On every single artistic community, this technology is hated. Numerous art directors says they are not working with it, and artist run platforms ban images generated by this technology. And fact of the matter, is that you are no artist. You have proven this by your hatred of an actual art form. „The infinite narcissism and entitlement from this crowd is staggering” What narcissism? What entitlement? The only such things were on the side of the AI defenders, and their endless child like anger at people critiquing their unethical toy.