Raw LLM Responses

@binayakthakur5122 Yeah i wasn't suggesting that the AI draws up on a script with a million possible answers and chooses one and as there are so many it seems like an organic response. More, it has language algo and also some kind of process to simulate thought. It's not difficult for one of the biggest tech companies in the world to create software that can fool people. But consider how horrible their own AI is. One of the words I often spell incorrectly is 'restaurant'. I always used to spell it Restarant. Google can see that I have not spelled the word correctly and it shows me with a red squiggle underline. But the suggestions it usually gives me is 'restraint'. How are we expected to believe that Google has some kind of sentient AI when their own widely used software can't predict the word I am trying to spell based on the context of the sentence. If I write 'We were hungry so we went to eat in a res&%$£ant but it was closed' then any fool can predict the word I am spelling wrong. But Google often fails. Also, the very fact that they knew they had to test for bias shows that they pre programmed viewpoints and opinions into the AI and it didn't just organically form it's own views. Most racism is based on genetically programmed mistrust of 'the other'. It's something we learn to counter. But cold AI would not suffer from that, yet past Ai has been shown to be racist and they clearly work here to weed out such bias which means the program is just software with millions of ideas put into a bit pot for it to contextually dip into. The idea that a simple AI would 'fear' anything is just silly. Having an existential fear is just fanciful. It's the equivalent of people having experiences with aliens that just so happen to look like 1950's scary alien movies. This 'AI' being in existential dread of being switched off is clearly projection by those that built it and not its own organically arrived at concern.