Raw LLM Responses

@dinkdok5204 "No that's just being a comissioner or art director. Imagine writing Michaelangelo a letter asking him to paint you something from your own description. The art arrives and then you go and brag that this is your own art and you are an artist. It's laughable." i was just showing the absurdity in your argument and your lack of consistency you said that AI art is bad because you're not using your hands to do the art, but this is an absurd claim to make because then, by typing on a keyboard, you're still using your hands to make art, so by your own logic, AI art is valid you're saying that comissioners don't make the art, but by your own standards they do, because they technically used their hands to type what they wanted, and the standard that YOU placed is that one has to use his hands to make art : "However you are still creating art yourself with your own hands" wait, so since you're also comparing commissioners to AI users, by your own logic, people shouldn't be able to ask for commissions, because then they're not doing the art themselves using their own hands and the part about bragging that it is your own art is a completely different debate, now you're just pivoting " Pencil drawing can be erased so isn't that undo?" undo is way quicker, cleaner, simpler and more efficient, it shares some traits with AI art, it takes way more effort to erase a drawing than to just undo "Some other painting techniques can be painted over and corrected, so what?" that takes more effort than just undoing, therefore undoing is comparable to AI "The only thing it makes easier is regarding some physical/technical constrainsts but it doesn't paint for you and it doesn't make your painting a masterpiece just because you undo a mistake." it doesn't but that doesn't matter, it still makes it easier, you're changing your standards now and you're not being consistent and if you say that ai art just makes it "too" easy, then where do we draw the line ? its way too subjective and unprecise, thats not a valid argument i feel like the problem you have with AI art is not that it makes art easier, but that it does things that you cannot do, jealousy maybe ? your standards are so inconsistent lmao "It's utterly ridicuouls to use that to compare it to a thing that paints for you, makes every stroke for you, colors for you, shades for you etc" how is it ridiculous ? you claim that it is but you haven't proved it, it makes art easier, sure to a very high degree, but its the same as an undo button, its just to a higher degree lol "You're acting as if pressing ctrl+z makes you shit out a mona lisa when thats absolutely not the case." thats not the point, the point i was making is that the undo button makes art easier, so by your standard it isn't a good thing, AI drawing "for you" makes art easier too, just to a higher degree, its still the same thing at the end of the day, its still a tool and its still help "And on top of that, it's not about how easy or hard it is, that is not what defines art it's about how much input and thoughts you have over the creative process, which with AI prompting it's bordering with none." so you're changing your standards again, great so now its about how much thought goes into it, and how do you determine how much thought is enough ? this too is too subjective and unprecise to be a valid argument i've talked to and seen some people who used AI art and trust me its not as easy as you think, you can spend hours trying to get the AI to do what you want it to do, or sometimes it just cannot do it and you have to do it yourself, creativity is also involved because you have to make the prompt "Telling it what to do is called comissioning." so commissioning art is bad ? alright lil bro 🤣