Raw LLM Responses

P.S. I want to add that an aspect which has always added value to art is the amount of dedication and practice required to get the artist to the point where they could express themselves so fluidly in their art medium. AI takes that away and just leaves the finished product, speeding the production time by decades.  I asked ai to edit a funny picture of my fiancee into The Mona Lisa. It took less than a minute, and earned itself a giggle. If I wanted to be able to create that from scratch, digitally, it would have taken me months, with all the tutorials available, just to get my hands to do the motions.  Also, through a short search, I found that Leonardo da Vinci practiced painting for approximately 37 years before painting the Mona Lisa. And when people see the real thing, I'm sure at least subconsciously their brains consider the amount of prior training to get to that level, and not just the finished product.  That's true for all movement skills, regardless of them being full body movements, or fine motor skills, like painting or singing.  With ai, it's like in the Matrix, when Neo downloaded martial arts into his brain and fought with super human abilities within a minute or so.  It's still impressive to see the act itself, but not nearly as impressive as the result of decades of practice and dedication.  This, however, doesn't make me feel that ai should be banned or ignored, since it still allows more people to express their points of view in different fields.  Sure, there are lots of shitty points of view, but the good ones will still find their way to the right people.