Raw LLM Responses

@Dave1507  that's true, but a person copying an art style and a large corporation of executives cutting out both amateur and professional artists by sourcing prior existing art to create content for themselves is a different matter. At least at this point if someone is copying something, such as making a painting of the Mona Lisa by tracing it, they have to learn by themself to put effort into making something, and I think that's what it comes down to. As a whole, artists both amateur and professional deserve to be fairly compensated for their work. People tend to take art for granted because as a whole, society doesn't place alot of value in the work and effort it takes to make a creative item. And because of this mindset, corporate executives don't think that creative deserve consideration for what they make because to them, art is a replicable commodity that they can exploit until they get all the money they can from it. And if they can have a machine simply copy something, reference other art from elsewhere at no extra cost (copying the art style of others essentially) then why would they need to keep creative people employed, or for that matter, allow amateurs to independently explore creating their own stuff? This could lead to them claiming they own anything that is being used to create their content (which wouldnt help a budding amateur if they happen to unknowingly have their stuff used in an algorithm), and because their AI would be sourcing from anywhere, it would be difficult to prove if someone should be compensated for something they create by cutting out the people both skilled and unskilled entirely. Hence why it should be important to check it now and regulate it before something like this cuts out humans entirely for billionaire studio owners to simply have a free money farm of creative content to monopolize at the expense of everyone else. Sorry if this is long winded, but imo, art should be for everyone, not just for those who are privileged enough to afford it. AI is a nice tool to use, but while helpful, I think plutocrats of the likes of Disney are eventually going to find a way to abuse it to make sure to potentially go after others for using AI for using their IP, and essentially copyright the likenesses of living people for their own profit.