Raw LLM Responses

​@sabagecabage7828 From looking at this and your other comments, I was able to gather one thing about you: you just don't care about art and lack understanding of it. Your implication in this comment that art isn't worth our time means that you view the process to be completely worthless. It's very obvious that you don't enjoy making art yourself, and aren't interested in developing your skills, as you said in another comment that AI "art" is "a tool developed to further simplify the lives we are forced to live", and that you "don't have the skill to make [art] of my own" (quoted from that comment, one word paraphrased for clarity). You understand that art is supposed to be fun, right? We make art because we want to. It's called a hobby for a reason. YOU yourself do not need to make art if it isn't fun for you, you don't get to control what you do or don't enjoy, but you're also not entitled to art regardless of this lack of interest to learn how to make it yourself. I find it gross that you've decided to misinform this person just to push your delusion that AI "art" is art at all, or that it's superior to real, genuine art. You straight up lie in this comment. AI isn't capable of being inspired, and AI art is *ABSOLUTELY NOT* 100% made by humans. Just because the model was trained based off of art made by humans doesn't meant that the output from the AI generation is human-made. The AI takes the work of humans and creates a horrific amalgamation of what was once beautiful works of art with soul and passion behind them, all crushed together into an ugly, soulless, pathetic imitation of what it will never achieve. I have no malice towards you, but you must understand that your beliefs are flawed.