Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Can we stop calling people that use AI ‘artists’ because they are far from that …
ytc_Ugy-soTPc…
G
Hey - Just a computer engineer here. This is just a friendly reminder that the o…
ytc_UgzyyHqqz…
G
Why don’t the Korean women start their own deep fakes their own telegram if the …
ytc_Ugz4QOXPy…
G
LLM generated communications are objectively worse than just passing around the …
rdc_n7vmxv8
G
Dear Steven Bartlett.Elon Musk is clearly considering, with Neuralink, the conne…
ytc_UgxwfVXOo…
G
DT just passed a law to override the states, so that nothing blocks AI progress.…
ytc_UgzmGIUvH…
G
If I have to use AI, I will use it from a company that takes this stance.…
rdc_o78kivb
G
Humans create new data for AI to “enjoy,” so I don’t think they will destroy us.…
ytc_Ugxphkgvo…
Comment
if it wasnt commercially then there wouldn't be anything for us to complain about, unless when an artist is really attached to their style they might get upset at it being stolen.
Indeed, an artstyle cannot be copyrighted. If you go on instagram you will find hundreds if not thousands of artists with the same style as Sam. But everybody has their own touch to it.
Except, what AI models do is steal already existing *art*, rather than the style. Copying the style into a model would be extremely difficult. But Sam already made so many pieces that it's super easy to just combine like 20 of them to create something alike to the prompt I put in the generator.
But yeah, we are mostly angry because our art is being used without our permission, *to make money* , atleast give us some profit as well, you know?
If someone wants to commission me, but I fall out of their budget, and an AI generator can copy my work for $5, then of course they're going to pay the AI model instead of the actual artist who puts their heart and soul into the art.
Get it?
youtube
Viral AI Reaction
2022-12-27T22:4…
♥ 1
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | liability |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytr_Ugxkk5mO3Jy3Ma21tkV4AaABAg.9k9PgUO1K5O9k9_t6JNTiy","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwJi-97pdTxo9ZK0i14AaABAg.9k9LeXc4ys09k9MEjwkMFC","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxnBufRzBKEWkUiDvh4AaABAg.9k9KwCplIcr9k9PBGyURRx","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"liability","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxnBufRzBKEWkUiDvh4AaABAg.9k9KwCplIcr9k9q9XBfGdI","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxOc8R7oKTIMeGhPVt4AaABAg.9k9K8WfHe4T9k9oys6HIgN","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxOc8R7oKTIMeGhPVt4AaABAg.9k9K8WfHe4T9kAsZPUOXbk","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwxgFnJODXU-u9dBgV4AaABAg.9k9IwvpF0Vc9k9K1L68fIT","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwTwTs8omt-Au_DBkl4AaABAg.9k9Il604BDw9k9pHXrPN7j","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwoGmbcyvxBYWJwFep4AaABAg.9k9ILJzWLtU9kBHa0cYSH4","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwoGmbcyvxBYWJwFep4AaABAg.9k9ILJzWLtU9kBOyNwPhKf","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}
]