Raw LLM Responses

​@wakeoflove AI generation is trash. It's not any better visually than human work. It still makes errors even a child wouldn't but looking aside that,it's a set of code. Not art. U compared automated assistance to this which is a false comparison. Those are stress relieving assistance that don't replace creativity. AI is a replacement attempt,not a tool & it's trying to replace human creativity as a matter of fact. Even a 4 y.o can make descriptions. We are the only creatures with creativity but decide to waste it for a corporate theft machine to do it in a matter of seconds. God must be highly disappointed at us for degenerating this much. AI prompters are pathetic compared to people who are individually unique by learning art & putting passion into it. If something is special then it's hard to get,drawing perfectly is hard to learn but it's worth it. After which the learner has intention for every detail on a work from human expression. AI can't do that,it's a set of codes that copies what other humans did in a soulless twist. How can AI be better than us if it literally takes 1000s of years worth of hand work. If artists stopped producing art then ai will get extremely repetitive real quick. A human imitating these styles has personal touches,learns from existing work & evolve further,understanding what art is why some images are the way they are & is still human. Not everyone can replicate another work by hand (fanarts for example) unlike AI that is not human,it has no personal experiences,no self thoughts,just codes eating & mashing up human work for corporate profit. AI actresses are a thing now which many people aren't supporting,even some parts of Hollywood despises it. We as a species won't be watching AI generated people while there are millions of humans with the acting skill. With it's physical features ripped off real humans that deserved roles AI artists aren't better than us who learnt because obvious what's hard to learn,adjust & get a passion for creatively is better than a description that even a 4 y.o can do. U must be able to express the creativity. Even if a person can't draw,such person can do creative things like storytelling(not telling chatgpt to generate it. That's stvpid),song writing,editing,baking & so on & can still learn visual arts. No one looks up to AI people. If Ronaldo,Messi,Robert Downey jr & basically every skilled celebrity then we humans are basically insulting ourselves,giving the impression that all that is impossible for humans to do. U can't draw & you're not any better than even the homeless people who adjusted their creativity As i said earlier,humans learn from other works & readjusy personality is such works & can even create their own artstyles which AI can not. It waits until an art style exists,then takes it. Saying AI can understand art is just like saying AI is sentient. Codes to "recreate form-factor_for prompt_description_fetch,from training_data" is not an understanding. If you're all in for the use of AI,just keep in mind that 90% of jobs are being attempted to be replaced Most artists are people who don't do art professionally & have other jobs still hate this concerning art eqally & not just their jobs. The one punch man manga is being written by a guy that can't draw but was joined by a guy who can,in turn making it the 1 of the most visually appealing manga of today. An AI prompter saying he's better than the artist is just laughable. Ordering pizza in detail doesn't make u a chef