Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
I have absolutely no idea which alternate universe you are uploading these video…
ytc_UgzQNjSA0…
G
As a computer scientist myself and tech enthusiast I feel about AI the same way …
ytc_UgzcwLw-9…
G
Healthcare Finance is immune to AI, because we have lots of laws like HIPAA that…
ytc_UgwrbZxaf…
G
lol. these dinosaur doesnt even know what the current progress of ai is. we are …
ytc_UgyCPUFAl…
G
The biggest and most realistic imminent problem os not the AI killing us all but…
ytc_UgwXjTkst…
G
What is happening is that everything is turning to shit. I am using AI and it ca…
ytc_UgztxbGNA…
G
For those who's think this is real. The robot is cgi. But that was sick edit. 🔥🔥…
ytc_Ugxx-S9HP…
G
@Speaker-Beateryeah yeah btw traditional artists used to say the same about earl…
ytr_UgxnEDO8H…
Comment
Correct on the movie bootlegging not being a direct analogy. The fashion analogy is closer.
A better argument: should people be able to produce and sell work from other people's skills. The answer is no. If you say yes, then you can just start making spins of Windows OS and sell it - legally.
You either have copyright, or you don't.
The simplest, cleanest answer - is the one I noted: they can sell the software like Adobe, Corel, and others, and individual artists can program in their own skills - and aid in production of their work.
Any other way is copyright violation. Or is copyright protection just for the wealthy?
Also, yes - it is true - that noting copyright infringement of other's work is difficult, and prosecution difficult. But it happens in the music industry, fashion industry, and in electronics industry (looking at Apple's track record).
Also, I did spot an AI piece that very closely mimicked an artists work. I assume they put this artist's name in the text input.
youtube
Viral AI Reaction
2023-04-10T18:5…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | deontological |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytr_UgxTuEa45Ks9C4wHlzh4AaABAg.9oH1YmT4eVu9oKxe2VQKFC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugyb74ZxEmJfHaR7kHV4AaABAg.9oEuDRkTu7t9oJpABcaW-9","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwV-Z-tAVOcLlfXWBt4AaABAg.9oEJvspmtqi9oFE-6fDnvx","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"unclear","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxYEiXzpublndJfMRd4AaABAg.9oC_sR8d79X9oHlTKZzhY_","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugxe8sRZndEI5CaaqDR4AaABAg.9o8WATsIuRC9oNnV_9ohrV","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzSlXZsQtSOps5PgYB4AaABAg.9o6q5xpYXYj9owLzyjreTn","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzSlXZsQtSOps5PgYB4AaABAg.9o6q5xpYXYj9oxNuwZVfVT","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzSlXZsQtSOps5PgYB4AaABAg.9o6q5xpYXYj9p9uKei2VgT","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugx1S-4_uXIB8qyKRI94AaABAg.9o5II11KJUf9oA9-KJor7D","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugzim0XfvtwJWyuy0Eh4AaABAg.9o30vWFmCeg9puQyQapQ5s","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"}
]