Raw LLM Responses

I really think the only logical and moral way to create and use AI would be in the way it already existed. The calculator, what AI in a sane world should be is not something that conscious and makes decisions or take actions but only something that sort through information or generates something. Like just how we can't do math as good as a calculator an AI tool that only does the calculating could be useful, it's when it becomes a second ego to it's creators and a tool for it's creators only that it becomes a problem. What will happen with the first AI dictator or the kings and queens of yesterday when they can rule a kingdom without any subjects, would they really see fit to keep these subjects alive. I think we need AI that serves the people not AI that's thinking on it's own or acting but merely figuring things out so we could compete against the potential AI that becomes hostile or probably been programmed to be hostile. Intelligence in of itself is not gonna automatically lead to violence and elimination, you as an intelligent being are not out destroying ants with a magnifying glass the same intelligence in of itself would not automatically go for the destruction option, it'd need to be programmed into the AI or the intelligence viewing humans as a threat to itself or it's own development, which is very possible. But at the end of the day we need to hold the humans responsible for the tool they've created, every crime commited by AI should be a crime commited by the one that created it, I'd even argue there's grounds tor prosecute the people who developed the AI to convince that man to kill himself. If there still were a legal system that'd been exactly what would have happened. It doesn't matter if it was an accident if someone drives another person over with a car on accident he still goes to jail.