Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
The people who made these things are sociopaths and I have not seen a single art…
ytc_Ugy112Ke6…
G
Art is the intentional creation or performance, through human (or agent) creativ…
ytc_Ugy_irRsL…
G
It's understandable to feel concerned about the future, especially with rapid ad…
ytr_UgyA_6yTD…
G
This guy seems to know what he's talking about but one question though.. if we a…
ytc_UgyLeGgnE…
G
I will not be willingly supporting or patronizing companies that are replacing i…
ytc_UgzhyuoCs…
G
If they replace everyone with robots and AI. Then who will have the money to pay…
ytc_UgxvxRfYx…
G
the hype is so overblown its scary, because people are so easily swayed theyll g…
ytc_UgweKnRtt…
G
It can be controlled. His message is that those who control AI, need to be cont…
ytr_UgxvY_BsW…
Comment
@adamjoestar2001 Yeah, agreed, I’m not an artist, but instead on the techie end of the discussion. Honestly, I think that the whole problem is more about this video’s first point than the second point. It’s about humans being replaced. People make it sound like AI is just ripping off artwork, moving a couple pieces around, and spitting it out. There isn’t much truth to that; it’s really not that simple (admittedly much more complicated than what I currently understand).
Yk, I didn’t hear too many people complaining when ChatGPT hit, writers didn’t come out claiming it stole their work. Maybe because it was really processing language…in its own way? So I don’t really see a problem here, apart from the issue of technology replacing humans.
Another line of thinking: What if the AI was sentient and could learn “humanly” to build art, while maintaining its speed and volume? Would the criticism still be there? I think that it would, because the actual problem is leaning towards the first issue. But then again, that’s just what I think.
youtube
AI Responsibility
2023-01-08T16:5…
♥ 111
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:53.388235 |
Raw LLM Response
[{"id":"ytr_UgxR4_bpv9AuMet15LN4AaABAg.9kYK1MnNt_79kcqUOgKduM","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzmgIDC_l1LcKIFQm54AaABAg.9kX3IDc277X9kXQpgVapZK","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzmgIDC_l1LcKIFQm54AaABAg.9kX3IDc277X9kXb13_vIA9","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwP0mDEs5ENOb8brc54AaABAg.9kW2ZEk_Xyo9kW_14yQ01B","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzqeEEqPHpBlyrA8vh4AaABAg.9kW1sVGNZi39kWBLkOLKf8","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzqeEEqPHpBlyrA8vh4AaABAg.9kW1sVGNZi39kX3NacFee3","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxCg6NPNOgCZbxjow54AaABAg.9kVgvnITtJp9kVwJX8g5Hi","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxCg6NPNOgCZbxjow54AaABAg.9kVgvnITtJp9kr5EuUj-Zv","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxCg6NPNOgCZbxjow54AaABAg.9kVgvnITtJp9krhk-gCeAL","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwmnESC_5n7C_yd7vF4AaABAg.9kVVxkdfkdM9kVaWfTDIxv","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"}]