Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
One day humans will create a robot, the robot has only 1 task to make the world …
ytc_UgyjMnyKf…
G
BTW I always get adrenaline rush when I corner my AI with drill-down questions t…
ytc_UgxETTqt4…
G
These people don’t understand what artificial intelligent capable to do it just …
ytc_UgzqwAuc5…
G
the ai takeover won't just be exclusive to entry-level jobs, soon executives wil…
ytc_UgxCwx62C…
G
Gunston robots perceive that biological life can only be created and exist insid…
ytc_UgyaNTEpa…
G
He answers all yes/no with both answering yes and then no and then arguing for b…
ytc_Ugx_Fehfh…
G
Saw that the inflation act has in laws/regulations that all new cars will have d…
ytc_UgyW1zUrM…
G
There is a saying about monopoly which basically goes that nobody plays Monopoly…
ytc_Ugzkvu62F…
Comment
@adamjoestar2001 Yeah, agreed, I’m not an artist, but instead on the techie end of the discussion. Honestly, I think that the whole problem is more about this video’s first point than the second point. It’s about humans being replaced. People make it sound like AI is just ripping off artwork, moving a couple pieces around, and spitting it out. There isn’t much truth to that; it’s really not that simple (admittedly much more complicated than what I currently understand).
Yk, I didn’t hear too many people complaining when ChatGPT hit, writers didn’t come out claiming it stole their work. Maybe because it was really processing language…in its own way? So I don’t really see a problem here, apart from the issue of technology replacing humans.
Another line of thinking: What if the AI was sentient and could learn “humanly” to build art, while maintaining its speed and volume? Would the criticism still be there? I think that it would, because the actual problem is leaning towards the first issue. But then again, that’s just what I think.
youtube
AI Responsibility
2023-01-08T16:5…
♥ 111
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:53.388235 |
Raw LLM Response
[{"id":"ytr_UgxR4_bpv9AuMet15LN4AaABAg.9kYK1MnNt_79kcqUOgKduM","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzmgIDC_l1LcKIFQm54AaABAg.9kX3IDc277X9kXQpgVapZK","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzmgIDC_l1LcKIFQm54AaABAg.9kX3IDc277X9kXb13_vIA9","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwP0mDEs5ENOb8brc54AaABAg.9kW2ZEk_Xyo9kW_14yQ01B","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzqeEEqPHpBlyrA8vh4AaABAg.9kW1sVGNZi39kWBLkOLKf8","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzqeEEqPHpBlyrA8vh4AaABAg.9kW1sVGNZi39kX3NacFee3","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxCg6NPNOgCZbxjow54AaABAg.9kVgvnITtJp9kVwJX8g5Hi","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxCg6NPNOgCZbxjow54AaABAg.9kVgvnITtJp9kr5EuUj-Zv","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxCg6NPNOgCZbxjow54AaABAg.9kVgvnITtJp9krhk-gCeAL","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwmnESC_5n7C_yd7vF4AaABAg.9kVVxkdfkdM9kVaWfTDIxv","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"}]