Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
…….. I was trying to make a moon ai. I was trying to make a moon ai. I was tryin…
ytc_UgxR4UkkL…
G
They openly have ai artist in their bio. Which yeah fuck ai, but at least this p…
ytr_UgxMLgBN5…
G
i do not belive ai will become advanced enough to become better than good art…
ytc_Ugx8mWP2y…
G
No.
These tools aren’t designed for the betterment of humanity. They are owned…
rdc_oh3fjdu
G
Love Kara's cameos on shows like Silicon Valley. She looks a little unprepared h…
ytc_Ugx0vsXOH…
G
These idiots that think they have automatic right of way really get me, the rule…
ytc_UgwHiunMP…
G
@Asi@AsianDadEnergyThis suggests that the AI company’s line that “the technology…
ytr_UgwLcqt2R…
G
That's....a weird way of putting it. And I'm one of those artists who agree that…
ytr_UgxXDQ-P6…
Comment
@adamjoestar2001 Yeah, agreed, I’m not an artist, but instead on the techie end of the discussion. Honestly, I think that the whole problem is more about this video’s first point than the second point. It’s about humans being replaced. People make it sound like AI is just ripping off artwork, moving a couple pieces around, and spitting it out. There isn’t much truth to that; it’s really not that simple (admittedly much more complicated than what I currently understand).
Yk, I didn’t hear too many people complaining when ChatGPT hit, writers didn’t come out claiming it stole their work. Maybe because it was really processing language…in its own way? So I don’t really see a problem here, apart from the issue of technology replacing humans.
Another line of thinking: What if the AI was sentient and could learn “humanly” to build art, while maintaining its speed and volume? Would the criticism still be there? I think that it would, because the actual problem is leaning towards the first issue. But then again, that’s just what I think.
youtube
AI Responsibility
2023-01-08T16:5…
♥ 111
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:53.388235 |
Raw LLM Response
[{"id":"ytr_UgxR4_bpv9AuMet15LN4AaABAg.9kYK1MnNt_79kcqUOgKduM","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzmgIDC_l1LcKIFQm54AaABAg.9kX3IDc277X9kXQpgVapZK","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzmgIDC_l1LcKIFQm54AaABAg.9kX3IDc277X9kXb13_vIA9","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwP0mDEs5ENOb8brc54AaABAg.9kW2ZEk_Xyo9kW_14yQ01B","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzqeEEqPHpBlyrA8vh4AaABAg.9kW1sVGNZi39kWBLkOLKf8","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzqeEEqPHpBlyrA8vh4AaABAg.9kW1sVGNZi39kX3NacFee3","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxCg6NPNOgCZbxjow54AaABAg.9kVgvnITtJp9kVwJX8g5Hi","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxCg6NPNOgCZbxjow54AaABAg.9kVgvnITtJp9kr5EuUj-Zv","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxCg6NPNOgCZbxjow54AaABAg.9kVgvnITtJp9krhk-gCeAL","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwmnESC_5n7C_yd7vF4AaABAg.9kVVxkdfkdM9kVaWfTDIxv","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"}]