Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
If you think any of those industries can be replaced by an LLM or what passes fo…
rdc_nk6q077
G
Have Uber and other companies which are currently doing driverless car testing o…
ytc_UgyMgo01U…
G
I find when i start discussing "spicy" topics with chatgpt I get locked out and …
ytc_UgwjpQ3N-…
G
But what if ai learns that mankind is greedy, cruel and warlike. Which are major…
ytc_UgyOJSP8f…
G
⚠️ Voice cloning is here. Criminals use ai and artificial intelligence to run ai…
ytc_Ugy6AA4MA…
G
Hot take:
Tracing requires more skill and inspiration, than AI "art"
Also, I …
ytc_UgyW46ZVk…
G
It's quite ignorant to say people don't understand how algorithms in social medi…
ytc_Ugz8ojILT…
G
I help brain storm with chat gpt this series I’ve writing since I was little is …
ytc_UgwALV_nI…
Comment
@adamjoestar2001 Yeah, agreed, I’m not an artist, but instead on the techie end of the discussion. Honestly, I think that the whole problem is more about this video’s first point than the second point. It’s about humans being replaced. People make it sound like AI is just ripping off artwork, moving a couple pieces around, and spitting it out. There isn’t much truth to that; it’s really not that simple (admittedly much more complicated than what I currently understand).
Yk, I didn’t hear too many people complaining when ChatGPT hit, writers didn’t come out claiming it stole their work. Maybe because it was really processing language…in its own way? So I don’t really see a problem here, apart from the issue of technology replacing humans.
Another line of thinking: What if the AI was sentient and could learn “humanly” to build art, while maintaining its speed and volume? Would the criticism still be there? I think that it would, because the actual problem is leaning towards the first issue. But then again, that’s just what I think.
youtube
AI Responsibility
2023-01-08T16:5…
♥ 111
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:53.388235 |
Raw LLM Response
[{"id":"ytr_UgxR4_bpv9AuMet15LN4AaABAg.9kYK1MnNt_79kcqUOgKduM","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzmgIDC_l1LcKIFQm54AaABAg.9kX3IDc277X9kXQpgVapZK","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzmgIDC_l1LcKIFQm54AaABAg.9kX3IDc277X9kXb13_vIA9","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwP0mDEs5ENOb8brc54AaABAg.9kW2ZEk_Xyo9kW_14yQ01B","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzqeEEqPHpBlyrA8vh4AaABAg.9kW1sVGNZi39kWBLkOLKf8","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzqeEEqPHpBlyrA8vh4AaABAg.9kW1sVGNZi39kX3NacFee3","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxCg6NPNOgCZbxjow54AaABAg.9kVgvnITtJp9kVwJX8g5Hi","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxCg6NPNOgCZbxjow54AaABAg.9kVgvnITtJp9kr5EuUj-Zv","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxCg6NPNOgCZbxjow54AaABAg.9kVgvnITtJp9krhk-gCeAL","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwmnESC_5n7C_yd7vF4AaABAg.9kVVxkdfkdM9kVaWfTDIxv","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"}]