Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
He was a little boy when Einstein was alive 😂😂😂😂😂 turns out not only ChatGPT hal…
ytc_UgzXKVpD_…
G
I definitely think this is a people problem, but not just in the users, but in t…
ytc_Ugz-tNP3v…
G
I think it's funny, no one ever brings up the fact that AI still doesn't exist. …
ytc_Ugz2CF3Vd…
G
At this point this is wear I want to Take an Axe to both the Inventer and the Ro…
ytc_UgjUMK6SQ…
G
They need to state very clearly it’s ai and I don’t think it should be on YouTub…
ytc_UgzlOslZD…
G
Using ai for art is identical to commissioning art, you are not the artist just …
ytc_UgxibAS2S…
G
If the ai gets rejected from the ai school
Oh boy time for some history…
ytc_UgwW-S40_…
G
Ai is going to take over managers jobs? That doesn't sound bad at all. Most mana…
ytc_Ugx7eeL1k…
Comment
@RuslanKD @shilpidey3184 As a Computer Engineer you should know that chatgpt is designed to be very friendly and very agreeable. I understand the benefits of using Ai to practice debates with the potential to avoid the usual risk of it being warped by human emotions and biases. You should already know that gpt will, a lot of the time, take whatever information you give it or assert to it at face value. The issue with this is, like I noticed in the flow of the video, after you give your answer to gpt, it does not question or demand proof for the claims that you make.
It just processes your answer and moves on to the next question without diving deeper into the context or proof of your claims/answers. Would it not be intellectually dishonest then to act that this "podcast" is somehow something to support our faith when the debate opponent (Chatgpt) is very prone to just agreeing with whatever answer you give as long as it follows some logic?
youtube
2024-09-27T13:1…
♥ 12
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | developer |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | industry_self |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:53.388235 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytr_UgyfPhvnM_uMLXmOyjR4AaABAg.A8nhJbNxXixA8o3mGc3xU-","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxKau967Wog7tlNuqF4AaABAg.A8nBNn1Lim_A8tVT-Egxte","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgySLp7aEzFoizph0LZ4AaABAg.A8n7zdXkOCWA8s7RjE5-_C","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugw_Yj9NTzfkFKEQTTl4AaABAg.A8n7yU_O4CvA99Ji0buVoA","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytr_UgyXgMZoJErqHA8A1Wl4AaABAg.A8mo9DZH63vA8nB1WaR5Ps","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxXzaPjnZ_kj2BGgtN4AaABAg.A8mm-R2YspiA8mpZH9mnCr","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytr_UgykXgym1KeB-7RMLyF4AaABAg.A1XxsQMDAIUA4TVn_-yAz-","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzD6MKMFQnxJNHBMh14AaABAg.A-ATpDVwFIcA-kR5f24ton","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwzWUX19K3t2eSLHW14AaABAg.9wi8DnM4_lL9x8tP8IrJ8T","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_UgyCyvMqaGecBKl6vVp4AaABAg.9vwpPY5AVMI9x8u4ucFvfa","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"}
]