Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Nah its time to replace inherently corrupt elitist and Beaucracy with ai . No mo…
ytc_UgzCMHX-l…
G
There is two possibilities :
- Either its just a projection from him, and there…
ytc_Ugx9Yp3pB…
G
betting against AI is the most idiotic thing. this isn't a fad like crypto. this…
ytc_UgzEXnXbu…
G
We don't need to worry about the AI being racist. We need to stop being racist o…
ytc_UgykjClED…
G
The funny thing is that 1/3 of the comments on this video are AI bots.…
ytc_UgystkeCL…
G
You see .. AI companies are continuously training their model and making them mo…
ytc_UgwD5FWAf…
G
humans also train on images without asking the artist but when a ai does ot its …
ytc_UgwpABGQ6…
G
Be creative and invent things for AI to improve and perfect, a symbiosis relati…
ytc_UgyI9ugyc…
Comment
@RuslanKD @shilpidey3184 As a Computer Engineer you should know that chatgpt is designed to be very friendly and very agreeable. I understand the benefits of using Ai to practice debates with the potential to avoid the usual risk of it being warped by human emotions and biases. You should already know that gpt will, a lot of the time, take whatever information you give it or assert to it at face value. The issue with this is, like I noticed in the flow of the video, after you give your answer to gpt, it does not question or demand proof for the claims that you make.
It just processes your answer and moves on to the next question without diving deeper into the context or proof of your claims/answers. Would it not be intellectually dishonest then to act that this "podcast" is somehow something to support our faith when the debate opponent (Chatgpt) is very prone to just agreeing with whatever answer you give as long as it follows some logic?
youtube
2024-09-27T13:1…
♥ 12
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | developer |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | industry_self |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:53.388235 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytr_UgyfPhvnM_uMLXmOyjR4AaABAg.A8nhJbNxXixA8o3mGc3xU-","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxKau967Wog7tlNuqF4AaABAg.A8nBNn1Lim_A8tVT-Egxte","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgySLp7aEzFoizph0LZ4AaABAg.A8n7zdXkOCWA8s7RjE5-_C","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugw_Yj9NTzfkFKEQTTl4AaABAg.A8n7yU_O4CvA99Ji0buVoA","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytr_UgyXgMZoJErqHA8A1Wl4AaABAg.A8mo9DZH63vA8nB1WaR5Ps","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxXzaPjnZ_kj2BGgtN4AaABAg.A8mm-R2YspiA8mpZH9mnCr","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytr_UgykXgym1KeB-7RMLyF4AaABAg.A1XxsQMDAIUA4TVn_-yAz-","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzD6MKMFQnxJNHBMh14AaABAg.A-ATpDVwFIcA-kR5f24ton","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwzWUX19K3t2eSLHW14AaABAg.9wi8DnM4_lL9x8tP8IrJ8T","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_UgyCyvMqaGecBKl6vVp4AaABAg.9vwpPY5AVMI9x8u4ucFvfa","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"}
]