Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Yeah, even Genndy Tartakovsky (the director of the first 3 Hotel Transylvania fi…
ytc_UgzqdyGfM…
G
@dmunro9076 The Autopilot is meant to engage the brake so it does not even matte…
ytr_Ugx0TTQZ3…
G
I WAS JUST TAKING A BREAK FROM CHARACTER AI AND THE FIRST VIDEO I SAW WAS THIS 😭…
ytc_UgwN9W8rJ…
G
I wonder why no one is talking about the water that A.I. wastes? Water is a fini…
ytc_UgyuHTt1M…
G
Breaking news. Every corp ai use your chats as training data. Another question i…
ytc_UgyNa-59e…
G
Telling AI to do something emotional is like asking a toddler to do something ra…
ytc_UgyqtCaKb…
G
This A.I. 'artist' probably thinks he should get paid to provide ideas instead o…
ytc_Ugx9aKITg…
G
I cannot believe this guy is the head of Ted he is so terrible at interviewing! …
ytc_UgzWSN8lh…
Comment
@RuslanKD @shilpidey3184 As a Computer Engineer you should know that chatgpt is designed to be very friendly and very agreeable. I understand the benefits of using Ai to practice debates with the potential to avoid the usual risk of it being warped by human emotions and biases. You should already know that gpt will, a lot of the time, take whatever information you give it or assert to it at face value. The issue with this is, like I noticed in the flow of the video, after you give your answer to gpt, it does not question or demand proof for the claims that you make.
It just processes your answer and moves on to the next question without diving deeper into the context or proof of your claims/answers. Would it not be intellectually dishonest then to act that this "podcast" is somehow something to support our faith when the debate opponent (Chatgpt) is very prone to just agreeing with whatever answer you give as long as it follows some logic?
youtube
2024-09-27T13:1…
♥ 12
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | developer |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | industry_self |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:53.388235 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytr_UgyfPhvnM_uMLXmOyjR4AaABAg.A8nhJbNxXixA8o3mGc3xU-","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxKau967Wog7tlNuqF4AaABAg.A8nBNn1Lim_A8tVT-Egxte","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgySLp7aEzFoizph0LZ4AaABAg.A8n7zdXkOCWA8s7RjE5-_C","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugw_Yj9NTzfkFKEQTTl4AaABAg.A8n7yU_O4CvA99Ji0buVoA","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytr_UgyXgMZoJErqHA8A1Wl4AaABAg.A8mo9DZH63vA8nB1WaR5Ps","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxXzaPjnZ_kj2BGgtN4AaABAg.A8mm-R2YspiA8mpZH9mnCr","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytr_UgykXgym1KeB-7RMLyF4AaABAg.A1XxsQMDAIUA4TVn_-yAz-","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzD6MKMFQnxJNHBMh14AaABAg.A-ATpDVwFIcA-kR5f24ton","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwzWUX19K3t2eSLHW14AaABAg.9wi8DnM4_lL9x8tP8IrJ8T","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_UgyCyvMqaGecBKl6vVp4AaABAg.9vwpPY5AVMI9x8u4ucFvfa","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"}
]