Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
We have created the vampires of legend…the undead….Not some machine god….Great i…
ytc_Ugw-9xODM…
G
Not sure what is scarier, the fact that AI and CGI are so complex you cant tell …
ytc_Ugz3QGtHP…
G
Can you imagine if we were told CAD was bad for engineers? Excel was bad for acc…
ytc_UgyMBU0G-…
G
The burden of proof is not yours. It’s always on the accuser. Taking a single ph…
rdc_kgp2u2p
G
The problem is the car manufacturers like Volvo and Uber’s self driving platform…
ytc_UgywelGNA…
G
What they all forget in these discussions is that if all jobs are automated and …
ytc_Ugwc3lrC6…
G
As much as I hate ai art the argument that it uses real art without permission i…
ytc_Ugw8SfkFT…
G
AI is not the real threat. USA owning alien UFO tech and quantum computers break…
ytc_UgxYl2oox…
Comment
You're right, finding a number to represent the probability of either of these outcomes would be complete speculation. Comparing them to each other, however, is possible. If we approach it as a limit problem there is a clear winner. Given infinite time and infinite compute, and given aging as a problem with technical solutions, the problem of aging will eventually be solved. On the other hand, AI destroying humanity is a scenario and not a problem with potential technical solutions. It is one of many potential scenarios, none of which are guaranteed to occur, even with infinite time and compute. It's not clear that slowing down development in AI, even if it were possible, would decrease the probability of the doomsday AI scenario. It would, however, decrease the likelihood that advances in AI help to solve the problem (and the existential threat) of aging within our lifetimes.
youtube
AI Governance
2023-07-17T06:5…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytr_UgxGaW9p18AEp5IotE94AaABAg.9rcov6TyeMk9sG0KIycBlk","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugz-I_5z2MH1F-xN_bt4AaABAg.9ra7EGbrpwC9s-nH-OgPNs","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugz-I_5z2MH1F-xN_bt4AaABAg.9ra7EGbrpwC9tOj5W4zn70","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzUXE2d9iCAiRPKfyN4AaABAg.9rYaYPPO-7MA72SGK_7Aqz","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugy8fQDWMBP-0LRsOAB4AaABAg.9rTdNN4aeVh9rY9ZyGIH8X","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugy8fQDWMBP-0LRsOAB4AaABAg.9rTdNN4aeVh9ra3e-kPDb_","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugz8-e_-RYQnkl5h3MN4AaABAg.9rT0qF094RK9rTtn13CD3K","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxcuDNaybYEsp5vnLZ4AaABAg.9rT-uSfjN9d9rTLwqFhvnA","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwH-6hm87UtoueFPWt4AaABAg.9rSv5z5xe2O9rWNAl3PZiG","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwH-6hm87UtoueFPWt4AaABAg.9rSv5z5xe2O9rsZ4ItlwZY","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}
]