Raw LLM Responses

Let me guess, chat gpt wrote this for you? AI can achieve great things, but this utopic idea you're presenting doesn't fit into the realistic scope of what AI needs to be doing. The problem with AI art is not about the whole "process" of writing prompts, its about the moral infringements it brings with it. You talk about a lot of valid points, but none of them justify any of current AI's aims. True artists do envolve and can embrace new tools, but AI is not a tool for CREATING art, its a tool for STEALING art. Its as simple as that. True AI don't exist. They are all just very good "data guessers", but none of them think independently a truly, which means they can never create anything, only rearrange already existing stuff, and this is another critical point you're missing. If it wasn't already a tool for stealing, it does't bring anything new and inovative to the table when it comes to art. It's a robot with very good pattern recognition and it should be used for THAT, not for "making" (stealing) art. Another thing you're not considering in your text is that AI produces a lot of trash, and of that trash a lot of it can have real world impacts on politics and society. If we have the power to create fake images in our hands, I think you can understand the AMOUNT of problems this can lead to, right? I could go on and on with loads of other points on why "AI" "art" is a problem, but maybe you should see this response as more of a "go search and think more about it" and less about "lets discuss this", because it seems to me you still have a very limited view in this topic (which is not to be taken as an offense). I'd like to reinforce that I'm not against you as a person, I'm against AI. So if there was anything here that offended you, I can assure you that it was not my intent