Raw LLM Responses

Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.

Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G I think the AI was saying he was 99.9% more likely of *being* shot, and they jus… ytc_Ugwpi_Xo5… G This is no different then when the corps sent jobs overseas to get 400% increase… ytc_UgynrtGHT… G I thought it looked wonky ASF lol but I love the real art! We should stop calli… ytc_UgxUiRuUj… G 4:15 to counter argument this a little, in this example you are consuming the *c… ytc_UgxZaC1tO… G There two tendencies in the latest years: 1.) The cities are more and more equi… ytc_UgzoI160N… G Honestly if I ask an AI image generator to show me ANYTHING from the past I’d ex… ytc_UgwzQp1Wt… G You formulated your statement well. It is not that AI sucks, it is that it is no… ytc_Ugw78D7-S… G Wanna add that MErcedes and other european companies are training Euopean cars b… ytc_UgxpSuVox…
Comment
Your example is incredibly flawed and makes zero sense, because paint is *made for making art*, artists are not drawing just for people to use it to train AI. Also, blatantly stealing/downloading an artist's work to train an AI without even asking permission to do so would still be copyright infringement, especially when the artist has explicitly told them not to. The artists aren't even getting anything in return for their art being stolen, which is worsened by the fact that some AI "artists" are profiting off of people's stolen artwork. And let's use your paint example again, but within the actual context of what's happening. It's like if someone was to buy a bunch of a paint company's paint, then combine it into a thick sludge, and then sell it as their own product. That would be considered stealing, and that's what's happening to artists. TLDR: your argument is dumb and is comparing completely different things.
youtube Viral AI Reaction 2024-10-21T11:1… ♥ 6
Coding Result
DimensionValue
Responsibilitycompany
Reasoningdeontological
Policyliability
Emotionoutrage
Coded at2026-04-27T06:24:53.388235
Raw LLM Response
[ {"id":"ytr_UgxAYh4vc2ACD91FZQ54AaABAg.A9r20dOi5iyA9r53F6qnKV","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"ytr_UgyaTLprRwI5dgcWGXx4AaABAg.A9r0u6GKaPgA9r2ry9qYyH","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"}, {"id":"ytr_UgwSWBrQxxPzVPtoOm54AaABAg.A9qujOZNrl8A9qvilcD2t8","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"approval"}, {"id":"ytr_UgxwdiTosZRoXkPaU694AaABAg.A9qtCMyShGvA9qtj_1oCxi","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"ytr_Ugx0H4pD5SaaRklATcB4AaABAg.A9qoMzx8vlnAA3ReQ5bwEY","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"}, {"id":"ytr_Ugw9FEAhQqYup1-Noeh4AaABAg.A9qoEfbFz0OAABoX1bhDtK","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"ytr_Ugw9FEAhQqYup1-Noeh4AaABAg.A9qoEfbFz0OAABtDXLN1gT","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"fear"}, {"id":"ytr_UgznSFALLN40rSYoppV4AaABAg.A9qmWx6fCbEA9qrHDsTfwF","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"}, {"id":"ytr_Ugwm3CKfdvrD0O463ax4AaABAg.A9qlzKkDrrwA9qrLnfw5K6","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"}, {"id":"ytr_UgzSP2qSYCDLPyh7Ekl4AaABAg.A9qkCuNz8eqA9qosW4s3i8","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"indifference"} ]