Raw LLM Responses

@thewannabecritic7490 Thats just not true. Not everyone can make art. Here's an example: I make browser games (for my own benefit - ie to learn). I simply do not have the skills, nor could I ever have (I know my limitations) the ability to make the animated characters for example. Backgrounds and anything thats static? Sure. But running, jumping, sliding, grabbing animations? No chance. And, as I'm not a game developer by trade (I'm a web developer), I make these things for the fun of it. Generally to figure out how old games were "made", but it can be basically anything I'm interested in at the time. If AI can help build the parts I cant (i.e. animated characters), then thats awesome. I can get on with the part I love to do i.e. the coding of how its all put together. Now, I get it. Most people are using their art to sell or show off, but that's not me. Even then, I dont currently use AI to make "art" as I'm too poor to pay for all that craziness XD But I will when it helps me skip over the stuff I have no interest in. Now... if I was going to sell my games? Sure, I'd get a real artist to redo all my rubbish or AI gen'd animations before expecting people to buy the thing. But again, I don't sell my games. It's not the point. Yet again: Don't get me wrong. If you gave me paper and a B5 pencil, I could draw pretty much anything you want. But when I hit photoshop, I'm just lost (and far too old to learn sprite art). Like I said at the start "Anyone can already make art" - not true. And I agree with you that industrialising art isn't good. It's just more nuanced than that.