Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Your Team needs to introspect how did they went from this to complete crap opini…
ytc_Ugy7c5m40…
G
AI "artists" will never truly experience the satisfaction of creating something …
ytc_Ugyg7k-Xg…
G
LLMs don't have to be better than people. The just have to be good enough. They …
ytc_UgxMCq7_i…
G
A journalist with more credentials in the AI field (Ezra is just way too much of…
ytr_Ugxcc7er2…
G
I would give this robot this knock knock joke
Me:knock knock
Robot:who is there…
ytc_Ugz0P5M4n…
G
The little submissive whimper from whoever was told to shut off the ai stuff 😭…
ytc_UgxdtYAgM…
G
Since I'm old, I've already been laid off and replaced by AI, back when AI stood…
ytc_Ugwlf7e4P…
G
I'm waiting for the product-liability suit against Elon, after he said his AI ha…
ytc_Ugxr7Byh7…
Comment
The belief that ‘new jobs will always replace those lost to automation’ overlooks key economic principles. Historically, technological advancements have created more opportunities than they’ve eliminated. While it’s true that new jobs might not immediately offer better pay, they often evolve, leading to higher productivity and eventually higher wages. Instead of fearing automation, we should focus on fostering skills that complement technological advancements. This approach will ensure that we can all benefit from the efficiencies and innovations AI and automation bring. It leads to overall better resource allocation anyways, because I assume you wouldn't want people to be the ones constructing cars physically haha.
The belief that more regulation is going to help is utterly inconvenient for technological advancement and as it has been proven, more state regulation only causes more wage stagnation and other unintended consequences, it just doesn't work.
You wouldn't want to ban printers because they take the jobs of writers would ya?
youtube
AI Harm Incident
2024-07-28T16:2…
♥ 32
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | approval |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytr_Ugy5woM8iA1mrULVIR94AaABAg.A6RioFj-lG9A6RtR3_EZKs","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugy5woM8iA1mrULVIR94AaABAg.A6RioFj-lG9A6RvO80o1KM","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugx32Qcd6vKs7bIG4-14AaABAg.A6RiK79Pz_LA6Rm4LfqDZg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwzYqRyrtR4qdPxjhd4AaABAg.A6Ri5KXvN8IA6Rnvgh5PLs","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxFy_65s-AiZYOJW6R4AaABAg.A6RhQxvJrBSA6RkTpORRrS","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxFy_65s-AiZYOJW6R4AaABAg.A6RhQxvJrBSA6S33ERmuVl","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwJIAJN6J_-qx453J54AaABAg.A6Rh8xPKEgfA6Rn3bgKHIj","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwuIg8n90y8q9fn4sx4AaABAg.A6Rgv6feTCCA6RikvNa-QX","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwuIg8n90y8q9fn4sx4AaABAg.A6Rgv6feTCCA6RoEc_DyeL","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxPlwp3f1o2PNKbOSB4AaABAg.A6Rgmm9tFXeA6RvsZN2sws","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"}
]