Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Way lower. Simplest reason is that too many human drivers break traffic rules on…
ytr_UgykXgym1…
G
It's not just good coming with AI, lots of problems will come with it
Great vide…
ytc_UgwH5r7sn…
G
Face recognition technology is unreliable overall. The Chinese started using it …
ytc_UgzvnhHOo…
G
Seriously, you are using Upper Echelon as a reputable source based in facts. PUH…
ytc_UgzUEkfqk…
G
This seems to be written by someone working for the CCP. They are deathly afrai…
ytr_UgwKRxpuh…
G
@shrimpdance4761I actually pretty much agree with all your points on learning. …
ytr_UgzbtJ-58…
G
@nickmagrick7702 Until AI is actually capable of making decisions on its own the…
ytr_UgxXr6p3-…
G
It's true the job market is shifting, and we're here to help you navigate it. Ou…
ytc_Ugz2dAEPO…
Comment
@insertname3977 No. That's how it works. I know those AIs used data STOLEN from artists' databases, pages, or certain websites that store artworks by a certain group of people. Even you acknowledged it as well. They used the stolen data to "learn" or I say it as straight mixing it, release a mixed picture, and remix it again until the user feels comfortable enough, then privately store it into their database, and someone will use it again, release it, remix it again, store it again, again again, and again. Which is why they always have the same traits. This is WHY I'm asking which artist it used because those patterns are there, the technique is EXIST, and there must be an artist that bro's AI secretly used, and the artist doesn't even get enough or even worldwide recognition from it.
Even if you say Pokemon Generators, which I didn't know and then I tried to look about it, those also use the existing data. It also works the same by using stored data, and just straight mix it, that's why you could see there's a pattern of a single monster that you can heavily recognize from it, even though it's a mixed monster. Which if I were going to put it into your words, it would be "I want to know which monster this new monster used from,".
Again, That's just how it works. Why makes it sound really complicated?
youtube
Viral AI Reaction
2024-08-06T07:5…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | developer |
| Reasoning | deontological |
| Policy | liability |
| Emotion | outrage |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:26:44.938723 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytr_UgzCnZrf-KAPUqPnBPx4AaABAg.A6mqO6DHovHA7u4DWJodAM","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugxhmc7aJkF2anLP9OZ4AaABAg.A6lx3ImZmAKA6muQ-1AFQF","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugxhmc7aJkF2anLP9OZ4AaABAg.A6lx3ImZmAKA7p8LH09lWb","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxsN8BfoQ_dfvD7jJZ4AaABAg.A6ldhEwiuPGA7VPYpbCRzt","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytr_UgziOlojWFdKi34ZOjd4AaABAg.A6kU4B6wZ4CA6kUUNW5YyT","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugy37rihi18wq3uvtmt4AaABAg.A6kNzeQy_i-A89tgfhRrfj","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugy37rihi18wq3uvtmt4AaABAg.A6kNzeQy_i-A8Ac2YySYHV","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxvsQSoOuokgCWVRC94AaABAg.A6iUn8XBu0vA7UW5rSn1i8","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugx-_84hG8QNbFAYXOR4AaABAg.A6iB_1RFTlrA6mw0-_Uxz5","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugx-_84hG8QNbFAYXOR4AaABAg.A6iB_1RFTlrA6n2QWfjXLc","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"}
]