Raw LLM Responses

What you said makes no sense, and it touches a lot of different things, that are not connected to each other. 1. Cosplay and fanart are labors of love for the story/setting, and are also free publicity for it. Not a theft of intellectual property design by large corporations to fire artists on mass. 2. If the large corporations wanted, they could already ban all the things you mentioned. 3 With Collage and referencing it already depends on the case, if they are allowed or not. 4. You know fair use is not a thing in most countries, right? In the EU for example, we dont have fair use, and instead only a list of exceptions were using copyrighted material is ok. 5. Large language models are a massive source of disinformation, and also a danger to getting the proper knowledge of the capabilities of students on tests. They are objectively bad for humans. 6. Protein folding programs have strong utilitarian uses for humanity, and their development has nothing to do with the unethical methods of data gathering used by these image generating programs. „If we fought back as is suggested we would loose so much more” No. We will only loose if we refuse to fight this. „. AI will catch up even with only public domain data” The very fact they used copyrighted data and refuse to rebuild their models on public data only debunks your idea. „You guys are delusional if you think that the AI or even AGI of the future would need to be trained the same way” And we have no evidence we will have AGI in near future, and all evidence points to this not being the case. ChatGPT costs 100 thousands dollars per day to run, and was trained on orders of magnitude more data then any human would see in their life, and it still fails at being rational. Language models have shown they need exponential increases in size and data to get less then linear increases in accuracy and quality of output. What makes you think the same will not happen to these images? „Adapt” And artists adapt by calling for regulations on these programs