Raw LLM Responses

Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.

Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G on my first year seminar of college , me and my teammate research that A.I shoul… ytc_Ugwm1xcJ5… G Utter nonsense. Genuine profit seeking companies do not want war. It is governme… ytc_UgyiHGO5A… G If 50% of jobs are lost to AI and Robotics and people are left without an income… ytc_UgwbQEeSl… G I would do it the other way. in any case, lifting fragments of AI and dropping … ytr_Ugz9wS7b6… G ah, so it will be as always: the megacorps will get their money/be able to sue, … ytc_UgyZMrtXj… G If AI's primary objective is human well-being, then maybe it will shutdown nucle… ytc_Ugx84QSTj… G Please never ask ai for advice. It’s designed to feed your ego not to protect yo… ytc_UgyVv6pG9… G Tesla autopilot doest make mistakes, its user error. We have some dumb phucks fl… ytc_UgxRZpyc1…
Comment
"Leading the way on ethical AI deployment" functions as legitimation theater—corporations positioning themselves as responsible stewards to preempt binding regulation. IBM's "governance frameworks" aren't constraints on corporate power but voluntary commitments easily discarded when profitable. Notice how "ethics" always means self-regulation: companies drafting their own principles, auditing their own compliance, defining harm on their own terms. This isn't accountability; it's regulatory capture before regulation even exists. The real governance question isn't whether businesses need "reliable frameworks" but who controls those frameworks and in whose interest. Corporate-led ethics initiatives systematically exclude affected communities, labor, and public interest advocates while centering business concerns like "innovation" and "competitiveness." Responsible AI governance would look like external oversight, mandatory impact assessments, worker councils with veto power, and enforceable penalties—not executive pledges and industry partnerships.
youtube AI Responsibility 2025-11-17T09:5…
Coding Result
DimensionValue
Responsibilitycompany
Reasoningcontractualist
Policyregulate
Emotionoutrage
Coded at2026-04-27T06:26:44.938723
Raw LLM Response
[ {"id":"ytr_Ugx9OLAA3Z4FOwfk20l4AaABAg.AS_vOhIRKvSASaINwoceoZ","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"ytr_Ugy1BotzE-zR5CfQlnV4AaABAg.AC2LEyLGc8iAC2PXx2mX5X","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"ytr_UgjjhVmopdBPnngCoAEC.8BsAm4xHtuS8BtL1-4lmhu","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"ytr_UghK9JWzzYfksHgCoAEC.8BrrReLGHpH8Bs2iLAUyj7","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"ytr_UggrhJ60UdmN_3gCoAEC.8BrrEAPregI8BtAGWVJG1k","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"ytr_UgigfbsD3xVn6XgCoAEC.8BrcF8D9mNF8BsC33aqVbL","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"ytr_UgibUnXWq06xDXgCoAEC.8BrbvRz8MRl8Bru_8BqsTy","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"unclear","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"ytr_Ugwh3v-8GeoSdSmne4B4AaABAg.A3T1yHwit-FAPcJByxRXmy","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"ytr_UgzF-wZJ569On403PCR4AaABAg.A3QWkoAMNS1APcJO2RR4NT","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"ytr_Ugz1b6hJ0hdS_gdTq4F4AaABAg.AHFbF0naRvIAIoHqlCUyiT","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"} ]