Raw LLM Responses

„Every single person who says ai is stealing their art either doesn't understand the technical side of Ai or is trying to get an emotional reaction out of people” 1. Again with this claim. It has been proven that 1.9% of the images Stable Diffusion are copies(mostly imperfect) of things in the training data set. And a new article has proven that some of the images in the training data set actually get memorized, and saved under a compressed form(even if this is rarer). 2. You also ignore the fact that the theft happens at the data collecting stage. „If you post your art somewhere, and it is viewable by the public. It is fair use to transform it in any way you see fit” That is a lie. If you post your art anywhere on the internet, then it is still yours. At the moment you make it, it is legally yours, and is protected by copyright, and being viewed in a public space changes nothing. „Compositions and art styles are not able to be copyrighted” This is not about these things. It is about training AI with art without the consent of the artist. „You can criticize the company all you want for using medical data and porn for their data sets, but the AI doesn't really understand what any of that data means” And you want it to have no regulations? „Artists have never stood for anyone else's jobs being automated” That is a bold faced lie, and you know it. Artists stood with the workers getting replaced since the Industrial revolution. Artists still tried to work and support people who lost their jobs. „Most still claim that it has no creativity or soul and that "real art" is still superior” It is. But that does nothing to change the fact that it will be replaced, because the companies dont care about artistic integrity, and only care about quality if it makes them money. Making the same mediocre things at infinitum(like the MCU, or before it, the Michael Bay/Roland Emmerich style action movies and bad teen romances), is something the corporate higher ups are ok with, as long as it makes them money.