Raw LLM Responses

​@palmabolp I addressed it, read again. AI only tackles plain and unoriginal information side of art. Performative, personal, delivery aspects of it are not and importantly _will not_ be threatened by it. Why make such a big fuss? I said why - because the artists of today try to be parasites. Artists have _no right_ to tell someone how information is to be used, that's an non-rectifiable offense against our capable nature, our mind and senses. Will you agree to get your eyes poked out, so someone can handhold you as you navigate through life? Go ahead if you'd like - they'll earn some money, make a living, you'll feel good about it. But it's a stupid and immoral argument to say that I or anyone else should consider or be forced into it as well. You'd have to pervert and mutilate our very nature to make your argument universal. If you want to earn back your "blood, sweat and tears" look at street performers. Originally, they're not monetizing their recording, they earn their fee in the moment of performance. Also, why do people go to concerts, when they can listen to music at home? Why do people go to theater, opera, other stage performances - especially for classics when entire scenario is known in advance? How come they still exist? Art is not just information, exactly. Figure out something of a similar sort. Maybe work for direct commission, like timeless art used to be made and let your patrons decide how they deal with your creation. Sorry that most artists aren't good enough to match that, that you're not entitled to money for it. Earn on the parts that don't infringe, and stop trying to be a parasite - otherwise every worthwhile effort will continue being spent fighting you. AI is finally doing some good in this sphere of life, and I fully endorse it.