Raw LLM Responses

⁠​⁠@clarissanavarro2762I can’t disagree with anything you say in your first paragraph, (or really most of what you say) and I don’t want to. You are qualified, you know your mind and process in a way that I don’t, and you don’t need an authority to endorse your process (especially in an Internet comment section). I meant to write what I did from a place of care and sympathy, but I be wrong if I didn’t apologize for what I said that came across as authoritative and patronizing. I don’t think you deserve that tone. I also don’t want to criticize your use of AI as a whole. We’ve both used it; while I don’t use GPT and I’ve never published a sentence written by AI, it has proven useful for me in the form of generated summaries of what I’ve written. It probably had some impact on my spell-check software too. And while I might think there are preferable tools to general AI software when it comes to accessibility, I know there there are a million factors like cost or user base that can mean there are cases where one might genuinely be the best tool for the job. I just hoped to tell you as a peer - and we are peers - that I think you write fine and that I think there are tools that might work better. That doesn’t make my judgement true; I’m no expert and I don’t even know you. I just want to say 3 things. I hope you get to keep the tools you have now I hope you find better tools in the future I suspect that, even among AI tools , GPT isn’t the best tool out there for what you need.