Raw LLM Responses

@water2770 It's not about 'witnessing art' it's using work without permission. Fair use does not include use of copyright work for profit -AI is a profit enterprise. AI buys data from data sets companies. Your face from every angle you posted online , and every part of your house and car you shared online and all your likes and dislikes are now stored . If you've drawn art or written stories and posted them they are also stored, they will be parts of programs like marketing/political analysis/potential customers/facial recognition prg'ms etc , companies pay for this data--your data, and if youve produced art/books etc -your books. All books, magazines, articles, blogs, videos, photos, artworks -everything are all stored -the web has been totally scraped -every corner, it has been purchased and AI is using that data -it was purchased from data set Cos that should not sell it (it is for research /education only) As an artist I pay for Photoshop and their photo.art stock of materials --they have now scraped their own artists who sold their work on their platform 'Adobe stock' and replaced those artists with AI which used the very same artists to create the new AI versions Adobe stock is now 99% stolen art-AI versions of the art Adobe used to sell for the artists but now has taken without permission and re-hashed as AI--for profit. Photoshop also now has a clause whereby artworks in progress and stored on their cloud can be 'used'. The profits are in the billions and so are the class suit actions. Game of thrones-new 'books' re-written, artist's work with their signatures appearing all over the world, thousands of videos belonging to creators taken and new AI versions made yet the original persons studio/place/possessions is seen in the background--these are all for profit . AI makes commercial items and they are using copyrighted material. It is theft on an enormous scale, and totally unregulated.