Raw LLM — Corpus Dashboard

Look up by comment ID

Random samples — click to inspect

G It's because clicks still generate ad $$ even if the content is garbage. People … rdc_ktcm0kv G A.I., will probably destroy any industry where creativity is involved. Art being… ytc_Ugz3TCUIF… G I had a alien encounter with AI in 2004 ALL I remember is emergency surgery was … ytc_UgyLEYySB… G In my opinion, it all depends on whether it's necessary for some reason, it soun… ytc_UgipRwhPa… G @laurentiuvladutmanea All people do is fear mongering ai same with every new and… ytr_UgzD-n52Q… G Its so simple it makes my brain hurt. All ChatGPT needed to say is that not all … ytc_UgyAFWCc7… G I'm fully convinced AI will lead to a 2nd romantic revolution, not unlike the af… ytc_UgwAc2uGc… G I guess it depends on what you want from it. I’m mid Java fullstack, with like… rdc_moxq6h4

Comment

@815TypeSirius it's copied art! An art thief is a thief of art, not an artist. Which also means the "art work" is not a new piece. It would be like ripping up a picture into tiny unrecognizable pieces, and still calling it a picture but its just a piece of a picture. And took zero photography skill to make it. Here's the unavoidable truth, if you don't make art you are not an artist. If someone else makes art, and a program remixes that art and not you, you did not make the result the AI did the mixing and the artist did the source work. It's worth noting this is completely different from using art software, because it is YOU doing the mixing and hard work and skilled part. If the program does the mixing then the result is either programs artwork or the original artists artwork, but not yours. Even if you convince yourself the Ai made a new work of art, it's the AIs work because it made it. Put simply: if you didn't make it, it's not yours. Imagine telling an artist to draw something and claiming that means what they made is actually what you made.

youtube Viral AI Reaction 2024-12-13T04:2… ♥ 1

Coding Result

Dimension	Value
Responsibility	ai_itself
Reasoning	deontological
Policy	liability
Emotion	outrage
Coded at	2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377

Raw LLM Response

[
{"id":"ytr_UgwryYBP3KaGVGv6YL14AaABAg.ACQdTbc-frDAD0J1MhaEOc","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugxv0RTYNZxa99D2TtZ4AaABAg.AC2v87-sR28ACx6VryJK52","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxgogzEj1Ct7bBFj6B4AaABAg.AC0iVmC_8BMAD7FmP7lVeK","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwVhvb01qXVZZvc_iB4AaABAg.ABrq4KgqYJQAC5_ml9kboq","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwVhvb01qXVZZvc_iB4AaABAg.ABrq4KgqYJQACD7yatdKH5","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwVhvb01qXVZZvc_iB4AaABAg.ABrq4KgqYJQAD3dCJ8ETbW","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytr_UgyOBwJA3m2lVdNgOu14AaABAg.ABnNu6e_Vc9AD3daD3TCNM","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxZV1Gj-ushax2-Rdx4AaABAg.ABYtSENlc7EAByeO8z16LE","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwQ8CraTJzFlVwSMkl4AaABAg.ABXbuCp2ujQAByflNMlmhA","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwQ8CraTJzFlVwSMkl4AaABAg.ABXbuCp2ujQABypy8Qtz-Y","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"}
]

Raw LLM Responses