Raw LLM Responses

@psyxypher3881 The libertarian audience has started to reinforce their own ideas among themselves, this is not a good sign; all models are wrong, some are useful. The automation claim is simple: 1. Humans have only 2 things to offer in terms of productive potential: physical and cognitive labour. 2. _ALL_ physical labour has been automated, so people moved to cognitive tasks like gardening and scientific research. (Notice gardening is under cognitive labour, the component of gardening that is yet to be automated is the cognitive component, the physical component of that job can be done for less than a cent an hour. 3. Computers start to automate cognitive tasks too, so people start to move from low degree of freedom tasks to higher degrees of freedom. (DOF has nothing to do with what people find difficult ex: multiplying two million digit numbers has a lower degree of freedom than recognizing a cat in an image) 4. Humans have a limited number of DOF to offer, there is nothing to say that AI will stop before that limit, more likely it will proceed way beyond that. 5. Unemployment will become a problem waaay before the scenario in (4.) We have to remember that during previous automation waves there were mass riots and a lot of suicides. 6. *And this is the most important point, the market has a track record of **_never_** catering to people without productive potential* . Thus UBI, or at the very least we better start experimenting with alternative economic models till we find something that is resilient to large portions of the population being _unemployable_ The world is changing our economic models need to keep up, there is no end of history, fukuyama was wrong