Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
You do realize, even Sam Altman (and apparently his whole team) think that gener…
rdc_kvdt8jb
G
A even bigger problem is that AI isn’t infallible. I catch AI making mistakes or…
ytc_Ugz80sTzu…
G
Experienced professionals have to babysit AI even for the simplest job to a degr…
ytc_UgwQvf37t…
G
the stammering in the AI voice is reminiscent of Max Headroom from the 1980's.…
ytc_UgycObNM2…
G
I think AI should have never been designed for stuff like movies and writing. It…
ytc_UgwhrhYXY…
G
chatbot is a T5 on steroid it is just completing the conversation like T5 was co…
ytc_UgzUR7Kla…
G
Pardon me but I think Elon overlooked something. There will almost certainly be …
ytc_Ugzlsd6z0…
G
There's already a robot that turns organic matter into energy. It's called EATR.…
ytc_UgzUm_ZNE…
Comment
@@SetaroDeglet-Noor Yes. But GPT-4 isn't an existential threat. It is not AGI.
AGI poses existential threat.
That's what Bengio and Tegmark are arguing for, not that GPT-4 poses existential threat.
GPT-4 poses risks, but they are not existential. I think Melanie can't think of existential threats of AI, because she is only considering current AIs, like GPT-4, so let's not do that. We need to consider future AI, AGI, which will indeed be able to do things that we cannot prevent, including things that might go against our goals, if they are misaligned, and in those cases, they could cause our extinction.
I'm a bit disappointed that they didn't talk about instrumental convergence explicitly, but they just kind of mentioned it vaguely, without focusing on it much. I wish someone like Yudkowsky or Robert Miles could have been there, to provide more concrete technical examples and explanations.
youtube
AI Governance
2023-06-26T00:3…
♥ 8
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | mixed |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytr_Ugx_TYMnuaoDy8oOl2Z4AaABAg.9rP-tW7VcEz9rTDYYTzOwx","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzILEF6c80rviWuew14AaABAg.9rOfRNYsrK_9rPr9ZZo3Gx","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzvAE9c82jICQGq7754AaABAg.9rOd7tgv5fY9rPIqd6kVCb","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzvAE9c82jICQGq7754AaABAg.9rOd7tgv5fY9rPllc8WblS","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwHyJCTsfpVlfgY4id4AaABAg.9rOUtK6eOPP9rOmEEPdeXC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwHyJCTsfpVlfgY4id4AaABAg.9rOUtK6eOPP9rPFptFVcrQ","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwHyJCTsfpVlfgY4id4AaABAg.9rOUtK6eOPP9rPrGXr5C7N","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugw_vDk_1yjEcZa0Su14AaABAg.9rOTUtSVYLV9rOmdhjqwjF","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugw_vDk_1yjEcZa0Su14AaABAg.9rOTUtSVYLV9sGpoflejiH","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugxsrxsaoh_cpFVOt0J4AaABAg.9rOMdAZj3ax9rOhT20qZ81","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}
]