Raw LLM Responses

@andrasbiro3007 Thats the thing tho. The AI does not realise its copying work. it has no reference. Its an AI, it does what you ask it to. and so long as it changes one character in text, or a colour plate slightly, it considers it new, simply because there is a pixel change. It has no reference. SO, If you use a search engine, you know its possible there will be copywrite attached to it. However an AI, does not tell you any of the copywrite, it doesn't really know about or understand it. I Love AI, I think it could very well be what moves humanity forward. But there are rules around using art from search engine results. but no such thing for AI If AI is no better than using a search engine, you must assume EVERYTHING an AI gives you is copywrite, and you cannot use it. And that would be... One to many steps backwards... If we're going to use AI we must either regulate what can be used in their training (ie, no copywrite images, which could make the AI completely obsolete, since it needs a large number of data to learn anything) OR We regulate what can be done with works taken from AI personally I think there should be a middle ground, where ppl can opt in to giving AI content to learn from, or opt out. While also tagging the works given for learning with the rules of copywrite, eg, this is copywrite dont use this without letting the receiver know it has copywrite content BUT, in order to do anything along the lines of the middle ground, We would have to sift through EVERY bit of content the AI has already used to learn...It would be a very long time before that would get close to completed (A step backwards) In order to find a better way, we must search for the answers.