Raw LLM Responses

@Blakhawk1703 problem with that is that history only needs to be explained once and thats already been done tbh in detail about nearly anything history related. and ai could easily do this with the data its got. but since it already has such a large dataset i honestly believe we dont need humans to do this anymore computer is just as capable in doing this. only thing it needs help with is interpetation but at the rate that its going there isnt much to interpeting left for us to do at this point and besides that there is only a select small group that actually decides how an ai does anything it does so in the end the developers decide how it does what it does and this means that there are very few jobs that would teach ai how to understand anything at all. its nearly at the point where it is starting to make meterial we need ai help to even understand it. So i dont think its really as black and white as the ai still needs humans to explain how to understand it. since you know only a small group of people decides how the ai understands anything. So at this point it could really replace around 90 % of jobs they always seem to low ball all these figures. but all i see is that around 90% of all jobs can be replaced with robot workers/computers. it doesnt just translate to office work that can be replaced but every industry every job everything anyone does could in theory be easily replaced once ai progresses not much further than it is now. i honestly believe in 5 years EVERYONES job (unless you are a nurse doctor or any type of job that is in human contact) is replacable and in 20 years plumber is also a job that no longer needs a human to do it. because there is a robot that can do it better. same with farming office work customer service anything imaginable a robot could do better.