Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Ai is our downfall with out MINOR regulation.. again “minor” ai is ok but it’s b…
ytc_UgyUXUmDK…
G
Kal mera friend bhi AI ML ki baate kar raha tha , fir call karke puch raha tha h…
ytc_UgycUk5jh…
G
Karen Hao is genuine, unique and so well spoken that in this short video she unv…
ytc_UgytIIAId…
G
Why does everything have to be so dramatic? AI isn’t some evil villain waiting t…
ytc_Ugxemz0CT…
G
Elon is correct in this. Anything acts and reacts from it rearing or upbringing.…
ytc_UgwjvlaqH…
G
If you think about it. In the beginning we knew almost nothing at all. Then we l…
ytc_UgztoeP-S…
G
Every year we're more productive and are producing more value...... yet we're al…
ytc_Ugy1yJ7aQ…
G
I feel like tech companies are just saying anything about AI just because it mak…
rdc_l5u8tfb
Comment
I am much more curious in how AI increasing a radiologist’s efficiency will impact the supply and demand of radiologists. For ex. If normally it takes 10 radiologists to clear a typical days imaging workload. Will Radiologists+ AI increase efficiency so that the same work can be done with 6-7 radiologists? If so, why wouldn’t businesses employ AI to increase efficiency and cut overhead costs?
I think this is a much more reasonable role for AI in the short term because it doesn’t rely on the technology being perfect. Even if it can do simple things such as measurements or early alerts on potential findings, it could still drastically increase efficiency wouldn’t it?
Overall it seems this is better for patient care, decreasing inefficiency in the system. I guess the real question is whether the increase in radiologists efficiency with AI will outpace increased imaging demands. If that does happen, maybe groups can leverage the increased efficiency to expand coverage area, maybe by employing teleradiology?
What’re are your thoughts?
youtube
AI Jobs
2022-04-10T18:1…
♥ 7
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:53.388235 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgwoM1SVbDEvFaCDubV4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxyxW3wlWoZyCc0Wwt4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwZa9aFlB3JhtBhkVZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgziTpvc6ek5gO1kgbZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwEVPezAZlCAGfgfH54AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"regulate","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugyh0D53sVQDmbAlnNl4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzzUL-cM88qnhHkCr54AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugzj6K1wdTf95bUC0G54AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"liability","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyB8WhuVM4o8cKni0d4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx3qj9FgyyaTWBwPb94AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"}
]