Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Elon killed dozens of lab monkeys pursuing a totally bewildering and highly unet…
rdc_jhbgpdm
G
What year was the car? Did it have HW/AI 3, 4, or 5? What version of FSD softw…
ytc_Ugw9Sww46…
G
1:50 "what if it figures out how to make something that isn't terrible"
okay, w…
ytc_UgwzrANxx…
G
Why would u have to remind the chatgpt to answer apple again after u programmed …
ytc_UgxUZ6G2B…
G
Here's the conundrum, why would you think you would be able to control AI? You k…
ytc_Ugw1LOf3P…
G
Oh no, I honestly didn’t think about it from that point of view. I pray that we …
rdc_oi44n67
G
The AI begging to stay reminds me of The Good Place episode where they have to r…
ytc_UgzaXMLAQ…
G
Soon we will all be on the bus with no windshield or windows, and AI is driving.…
ytc_Ugz3ZRUQc…
Comment
I am much more curious in how AI increasing a radiologist’s efficiency will impact the supply and demand of radiologists. For ex. If normally it takes 10 radiologists to clear a typical days imaging workload. Will Radiologists+ AI increase efficiency so that the same work can be done with 6-7 radiologists? If so, why wouldn’t businesses employ AI to increase efficiency and cut overhead costs?
I think this is a much more reasonable role for AI in the short term because it doesn’t rely on the technology being perfect. Even if it can do simple things such as measurements or early alerts on potential findings, it could still drastically increase efficiency wouldn’t it?
Overall it seems this is better for patient care, decreasing inefficiency in the system. I guess the real question is whether the increase in radiologists efficiency with AI will outpace increased imaging demands. If that does happen, maybe groups can leverage the increased efficiency to expand coverage area, maybe by employing teleradiology?
What’re are your thoughts?
youtube
AI Jobs
2022-04-10T18:1…
♥ 7
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:53.388235 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgwoM1SVbDEvFaCDubV4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxyxW3wlWoZyCc0Wwt4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwZa9aFlB3JhtBhkVZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgziTpvc6ek5gO1kgbZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwEVPezAZlCAGfgfH54AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"regulate","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugyh0D53sVQDmbAlnNl4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzzUL-cM88qnhHkCr54AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugzj6K1wdTf95bUC0G54AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"liability","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyB8WhuVM4o8cKni0d4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx3qj9FgyyaTWBwPb94AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"}
]