Raw LLM Responses

I think AI is going to take over the majority of jobs that there won't be many jobs left. First, it will take over a lot of the digital jobs because it's got no physical presences, but eventually that will change with merging AI and robotics together, then it's likely to take over the majority of jobs in the physical world. The irony is about all this is that the capitalist system we live under will demand it takes over, what I mean by that is competition will put a lot of pressure on companies to use AI and robotics to stay competitive, whiles consumers will always be pulled towards cheaper and better products, which I've no doubt that over the long run, AI is going to be cheaper, faster and better at creating then we can, meaning, competition and consumer habits will squeeze us out of the job market in most areas. That's not a problem in its self but it is a problem with the current system we live under that demands we work, we are very likely going to need a new system, which will likely mean having a much stronger social net in place, probably even something like a basic income, Europe is probably in a strong position as they have a more cooperative mindset over an individual mindset, they also have a much stronger social system in place, it would just be a matter of boosting the safety net so it's much stronger, which AI and robotics should give the resources to do. So I think Europe will be fine with this transition, but I'm not so sure about the US, China and many other parts of the world that either have a strong individual mindset, insane capitalism that throws people under the bus or just a self-centred mindset with a weak safety net which will end up meaning far more profits in fewer hands and a much bigger inequality divide. Personally, I think AI and robotics will end up creating a revolution in places like the US and China as things get really bad, but in Europe and many other strong social democracies, it's more likely to create a transition, probably not a smooth one but far better than I think will happen in the US and it really boils down to the mindset of the people, an individual mindset compared to a cooperative mindset, meaning in Europe, the wealth benefits of AI and robotics will likely reach the people far more whiles in the US, I suspect it's going to a very few insanely wealthy people at the expense of the rest of the population. There's also going to mean a lot more government intervention in society, another area that Europe is strong on compared to the US, without that, then we are going to end up with mega corporations with insane amounts of wealth at the expense of everyone else, basically the US or China, and that's highly unlikely to happen in Europe because of the mindset of the people, the social system and the governmental system. So the real question is, how high does unemployment numbers have to go before the system cracks? The higher it goes, the closer to revolution we get, which would not be a peaceful revolution and one that likely would be a threat to governments and big corporations if change doesn't happen, and again, I think Europe for the most part will do this transition quite smoothly compared to the likes of the US and China that will let things get worse until it gets to braking point and revolution breaks out or some kind of Blade Runner like future, I think revolution is more likely. I know some will say that we can't afford a UBI like system, but we should remember, if AI and robotics is doing most of the jobs, the wealth in the system would be insane, also, the tax revenue needed for the system would be far lower as AI and robotics will be able to do most of those jobs for a fraction of the cost, so it's not about whether the resources are there, it's about the allocation of those resources.