Raw LLM — Corpus Dashboard

Look up by comment ID

Random samples — click to inspect

G My understanding is, Helen wrote a research paper perceived of being critical to… ytr_Ugweo-h-T… G With the current AI hype bubble, failure was inevitable. Not because AI is impos… ytc_UgylmtH5D… G People want AI to make their life easier, but they don’t want it to make it easy… ytc_Ugyas712k… G You convinced me that it's fake :) how come AI is inhaling during the conversati… ytc_UgzYMkGBr… G Thanks very much ! I was searching for an application to avoid AI stealing !!… ytc_Ugys2Bewx… G The question is, "If true AI happens, will we even notice?" Maybe if we somehow … ytc_UgwoaMN-v… G Let's educate ourselves and our children that chatGPT is a tool, more like a li… ytc_UgyIYIR3n… G behold “the father” of the “self proclaimed doom” who is presenting himself as t… ytc_UgyVxBZVT…

Comment

25:09 I gotta nitpick Shad a bit. Saying "theft doesn't matter, because non-theft models are just as good" is just insane. Theft would matter MORE in that case, not less. If stealing and not stealing gives the same results, then it's literally impossible to justify stealing! Basically, he's destroyed his own side's only defence. AI companies rely on the "but stealing makes us better :(" argument because it's their _only_ reason to justify theft, and he argued against it for some reason! - 26:03 Also... The fact the artwork was done by a human is a sufficient difference between Van Gogh's copying and AI copying. The purpose behind Van Gogh's copying was to train and develop his own skills, develop his own style, and add his own creativity to the piece of art. For someone using AI to generate a prompt doing the same thing (i.e. typing "make [painting's name] in [artist's] style", as a general example), their purpose is to effortlessly help in screwing over artists. They _don't_ develop their own ability, they _don't_ develop their own style, and they _don't_ add their own creativity. It's lazy theft.

youtube Viral AI Reaction 2025-10-06T17:5…

Coding Result

Dimension	Value
Responsibility	company
Reasoning	deontological
Policy	liability
Emotion	outrage
Coded at	2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011

Raw LLM Response

[
{"id":"ytc_Ugya3mGMAhdb1tUtDHl4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugzwl1HmbSAYd67t9dp4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzZxfvQyrzexRI_C4N4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx8MqL6HSxJTYz8AWp4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx-THrMG_cIDSXM9Y54AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy7pteA8-vhN5kUKd14AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgybDtfOLqdhlvmAJSV4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzC6rOoNieXlhP9koV4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzRdOTwenlslmY3_ll4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyYtFczeUNK1mXwJV14AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"}
]

Raw LLM Responses