Raw LLM Responses

Taking someone else's work and using it in full for your own commercial purposes in a way where your product's entire value is derived from the work of other people, without notice, permission, license or consent to doing so, cannot be argued to be fair use by anyone who isn't a malicious actor. You might as well argue that digitizing a physical book is transformative enough to constitute fair use. AI is intellectual property theft on the biggest scale in human history. Copyright, intellectual property rights and right to one's own likeness cannot exist in a world where AI companies get away with this. The same argument that allows AI companies to continue using proprietary data for their commercial purposes would enable any company to use any IP, proprietary data and copyrighted content of anyone else without prior notice, agreement or consent. Wanna use Fortnite's source code in your game? Go ahead! Just argue it's transformative because the game is different! Wanna use anime characters to promote your business or politics? Go ahead! Just argue it's transformative because the context is different! Someone has a patent for a thing? Just use that patent, but scuff up the finish on the product so you can argue it's transformative because it's uglier! There's a reason why OpenAI paid Disney a billion dollars, and it's not because they're good guys giving back to the people they stole from. They know Disney could tear them apart with lawsuits, as can anyone else with the money to afford a half decent lawyer. This stuff needs to get killed before it embeds itself so deep in society that we can't get it out.