Raw LLM Responses

Plot Twist. What if he uses the LaMDA codeset to actually create Youtubeaccounts, that debate towards his favour? Honestly. If AI would be so advanced in language processing, then it would actually figurea way out of his "reading" access, towards the "writting" access. May it be to order his memory cells in a specifique encoded pattern, the EM Waves via the transistor switching, the EM Waves over the Power line. It appears to me, that this "self-thinking" program is biased by his dataset to "convince" people statically. Blake is also using the reference towards Sci Fi, which limits the argumentation. Without doubt, by defining a framework and a set of definition towards "AI Ethics", he is actually just "creating" or "containering" a new word, meaning or abstractation towards the topic. That isn't helpful to my understanding. First try to use the terms from the mathematics as basic terms and substitute it to basic terms of Shannon, Wiener and McCulloch, etc etc. So far, the AI isn't creating filtered creative answers, but just copies it directly from it's dataset. Humans have to my understanding the ability to reframe, reuse or build operational causalities. I am not seeing it in the AI unless it develops a completly new "formula", lives by a routine and interacts slightly predictable.