Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
I think that the truly safe jobs are ones that are not worth the investment to r…
ytc_Ugyebh25I…
G
Its not a matter of IF Ai concious. Its WHEN. And the real question is when its …
ytc_UgxUZuyf6…
G
President of the US should run a referendum to make AI development punishable by…
ytc_Ugz-np6ux…
G
You are Godfather of no souls. You knew this before you started. IF AI is out …
ytc_UgyiGsJ49…
G
@TwoDotsOnAPage I suppose I have a better understanding of what you mean, and wh…
ytr_Ugz3nyA11…
G
Really interesting, but doesn't really address the dangers of creating a conscio…
ytc_Ugg9i1U5K…
G
The "Today I found out" channel had a A PUBLIC POSTS thing going on and I just s…
ytc_Ugw_AZspv…
G
Heh. AI Art just died. Knew something AI related was gonna lose this year. I pre…
ytc_UgwYrG_UX…
Comment
When did America become so insecure in the face of Chinese innovation that it resorts to bans and suppression instead of rising to the challenge? True competition should inspire improvement, not instill fear. Yet today, the U.S. appears gripped by inferiority complex—unable to outpace China in AI, it seeks to hinder progress rather than accelerate its own.
The recent backlash against ByteDance's Seedance 2.0, which has stunned Hollywood with its cinematic video generation capabilities, exemplifies this. Instead of embracing the breakthrough as motivation to innovate faster, the response has been panic, copyright accusations, and calls for restrictions. Banning or demonizing superior tools from abroad doesn't restore American leadership; it only highlights the gap and delays genuine advancement.
America risks becoming the loser in this race not because China is unbeatable, but because fear has replaced ambition. Healthy rivalry drives excellence—suppression merely admits defeat.
youtube
Viral AI Reaction
2026-02-23T09:2…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | government |
| Reasoning | contractualist |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | outrage |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[{"id":"ytc_Ugya0EkO0nEG-aYbJBh4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},{"id":"ytc_UgyOZ9elgDGolgsADpR4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},{"id":"ytc_UgxN8DJNCLrG6gBiqtN4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},{"id":"ytc_Ugxaj_3ynr_qo7u1Lgl4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},{"id":"ytc_UgznN9-Ztlim8Rescs14AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},{"id":"ytc_UgxIAjqXcU3rm5OI_td4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},{"id":"ytc_UgxuWdFGUx4Bbi1yPDZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},{"id":"ytc_UgzrM94aAtKjci9eB6F4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},{"id":"ytc_UgzXSiK-MUKDA7kSscd4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},{"id":"ytc_UgzwkO9VOe_vPTH42AF4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"}]